Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778071›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A deep learning model for brain segmentation across pediatric and adult populations.

Jaime Simarro, Maria Ines Meyer, Simon Van Eyndhoven, Thanh Vân Phan, Thibo Billiet, Diana M Sima, Els Ortibus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jaime Simarroicometrix, Leuven, Belgium. jaime.simarro@icometrix.com.
Maria Ines Meyericometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Simon Van Eyndhovenicometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Thanh Vân Phanicometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Thibo Billieticometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Diana M Simaicometrix, Leuven, Belgium.
Els OrtibusDepartment of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 956394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated quantification of brain tissues on MR images has greatly contributed to the diagnosis and follow-up of neurological pathologies across various life stages. However, existing solutions are specifically designed for certain age ranges, limiting their applicability in monitoring brain development from infancy to late adulthood. This retrospective study aims to develop and validate a brain segmentation model across pediatric and adult populations. First, we trained a deep learning model to segment tissues and brain structures using T1-weighted MR images from 390 patients (age range: 2-81 years) across four different datasets. Subsequently, the model was validated on a cohort of 280 patients from six distinct test datasets (age range: 4-90 years). In the initial experiment, the proposed deep learning-based pipeline, icobrain-dl, demonstrated segmentation accuracy comparable to both pediatric and adult-specific models across diverse age groups. Subsequently, we evaluated intra- and inter-scanner variability in measurements of various tissues and structures in both pediatric and adult populations computed by icobrain-dl. Results demonstrated significantly higher reproducibility compared to similar brain quantification tools, including childmetrix, FastSurfer, and the medical device icobrain v5.9 (p-value< 0.01). Finally, we explored the potential clinical applications of icobrain-dl measurements in diagnosing pediatric patients with Cerebral Visual Impairment and adult patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38778071
PMCPMC11111768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.