ArticleScientific reports2024
A deep learning model for brain segmentation across pediatric and adult populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based cerebellar segmentation on T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging for detecting cerebellar hypoplasia/atrophy in infants.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
- Early Versus Delayed Treatment with Ocrelizumab: A Multicenter, Real-World Observational Study in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for pediatric neuroimaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Spinal cord reserve is associated with multi-dimensional clinical resilience in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Post-MI: unsupervised brain tissue segmentation via post-maximized mutual information.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Real-world federated learning for brain imaging scientists.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- MultiModal craniocerebral diagnose based on 3D CT and image reports.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Easy-to-use and easy-to-interpret quality control of 3D gradient echo T1-weighted MR acquisition sequences for improved test-retest stability of MRI-based hippocampus volumetry.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2025Article
- Focally Enlarged Perivascular Spaces in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients with Polymicrogyria-an MRI Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Automatic brain quantification in children with unilateral cerebral palsy.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Automated pediatric brain tumor imaging assessment tool from CBTN: Enhancing suprasellar region inclusion and managing limited data with deep learning.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated quantification of brain tissues on MR images has greatly contributed to the diagnosis and follow-up of neurological pathologies across various life stages. However, existing solutions are specifically designed for certain age ranges, limiting their applicability in monitoring brain development from infancy to late adulthood. This retrospective study aims to develop and validate a brain segmentation model across pediatric and adult populations. First, we trained a deep learning model to segment tissues and brain structures using T1-weighted MR images from 390 patients (age range: 2-81 years) across four different datasets. Subsequently, the model was validated on a cohort of 280 patients from six distinct test datasets (age range: 4-90 years). In the initial experiment, the proposed deep learning-based pipeline, icobrain-dl, demonstrated segmentation accuracy comparable to both pediatric and adult-specific models across diverse age groups. Subsequently, we evaluated intra- and inter-scanner variability in measurements of various tissues and structures in both pediatric and adult populations computed by icobrain-dl. Results demonstrated significantly higher reproducibility compared to similar brain quantification tools, including childmetrix, FastSurfer, and the medical device icobrain v5.9 (p-value< 0.01). Finally, we explored the potential clinical applications of icobrain-dl measurements in diagnosing pediatric patients with Cerebral Visual Impairment and adult patients with Alzheimer's Disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.