Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778049›Full record

ReviewCell death discovery2024

Need for standardization of Influenza A virus-induced cell death in vivo to improve consistency of inter-laboratory research findings.

Teodora Oltean, Jonathan Maelfait, Xavier Saelens, Peter Vandenabeele

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death discovery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The cell death regulator c-FLIPJournal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. PARP12-mediated mono-ADP-ribosylation as a checkpoint for necroptosis and apoptosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Innate immune role of IL-6 in influenza a virus pathogenesis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Teodora OlteanVIB Center for Inflammation Research, Cell Death and Inflammation Unit, Ghent, Belgium.
Jonathan MaelfaitVIB Center for Inflammation Research, Cell Death and Inflammation Unit, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1476-0583
Xavier SaelensVIB Center for Medical Biotechnology, Ghent, Belgium.
Peter VandenabeeleVIB Center for Inflammation Research, Cell Death and Inflammation Unit, Ghent, Belgium. Peter.Vandenabeele@irc.vib-ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6669-8822

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The involvement of necroptosis in the control of influenza A virus (IAV) infection has been reported in multiple studies. Downstream of the nucleic acid sensor ZBP1, RIPK3 kinase activity is critically involved in the induction of necroptotic cell death by phosphorylating MLKL, while RIPK3 as a scaffold can induce apoptosis. Paradoxically, RIPK3-deficiency of mice may result in increased or decreased susceptibility to IAV infection. Here, we critically review the published reports on the involvement of RIPK3 in IAV infection susceptibility and try to identify differences in experimental settings that could explain seemingly conflicting outcomes. Analysis of the experimental reports revealed differences in the IAV challenge dose, the IAV inoculum preparation, IAV titer assessment, as well as the route of inoculation between studies. Furthermore, differences were noticed in the inclusion of littermate controls, which show high variance in viral sensitivity. Our evaluation argues for a standardized setup for IAV infection experiments including the preparation of the IAV virus, the use of different IAV infectious doses description and the proper experimental genetic controls of the mouse strains to increase inter-laboratory consistency in this field. Workflow for IAV infection studies in vivo: Viral preparation and titer assessment should be as standardized as possible with the use of a universal repository (such as BEI resources). Infection studies in genetically modified mice and littermate controls should include dose-response experimentation, following a defined infection route and inoculation volume. Data are generated by consistent analysis methods.

Identifiers

PMID38778049
PMCPMC11111761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.