Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778035›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The neural mechanism of communication between graduate students and advisers in different adviser-advisee relationships.

Yan Zhang, Peipei Wu, Simiao Xie, Yan Hou, Huifen Wu, Hui Shi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yan ZhangSchool of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Peipei Wu *School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Simiao Xie *School of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Yan HouSchool of Education, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, Hubei, China.
Huifen WuSchool of Education, Hubei Engineering University, Xiaogan, 432100, Hubei, China. Wuhuifen@hust.edu.cn.
Hui ShiDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China. dlshihui@163.com.

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST 2023WKFZZX109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication is crucial in constructing the relationship between students and advisers, ultimately bridging interpersonal interactions. Only a few studies however explore the communication between postgraduate students and advisers. To fill the gaps in the empirical researches, this study uses functional near-infrared spectroscopy (FNIRS) techniques to explore the neurophysiology differences in brain activation of postgraduates with different adviser-advise relationships during simulated communication with their advisers. Results showed significant differences in the activation of the prefrontal cortex between high-quality and the low-quality students during simulating and when communicating with advisers, specifically in the Broca's areas, the frontal pole, and the orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices. This further elucidated the complex cognitive process of communication between graduate students and advisers.

Indexed as

CommunicationPrefrontal CortexStudentsAdultBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung AdultAdviser-advisee communicationAdviser-advisee relationshipsFNIRS

Identifiers

PMID38778035
PMCPMC11111769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.