Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38778023›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Prediction of Klebsiella phage-host specificity at the strain level.

Dimitri Boeckaerts, Michiel Stock, Celia Ferriol-González, Jesús Oteo-Iglesias, Rafael Sanjuán, Pilar Domingo-Calap, Bernard De Baets, Yves Briers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Predicting phage-host specificity.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Antimicrobial Resistance: How Can We Overcome the Problem?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dimitri BoeckaertsLaboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-2840
Michiel StockKERMIT, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0903-6061
Celia Ferriol-GonzálezInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4366-8199
Jesús Oteo-IglesiasLaboratorio de Referencia e Investigación en Resistencia a Antibióticos e Infecciones Relacionadas con la Asistencia Sanitaria, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Rafael SanjuánInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-545X
Pilar Domingo-CalapInstitute for Integrative Systems Biology (I2SysBio), Universitat de Valencia-CSIC, Paterna, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2829-8809
Bernard De BaetsKERMIT, Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3876-620X
Yves BriersLaboratory of Applied Biotechnology, Department of Biotechnology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Yves.Briers@UGent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7723-1040

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phages are increasingly considered promising alternatives to target drug-resistant bacterial pathogens. However, their often-narrow host range can make it challenging to find matching phages against bacteria of interest. Current computational tools do not accurately predict interactions at the strain level in a way that is relevant and properly evaluated for practical use. We present PhageHostLearn, a machine learning system that predicts strain-level interactions between receptor-binding proteins and bacterial receptors for Klebsiella phage-bacteria pairs. We evaluate this system both in silico and in the laboratory, in the clinically relevant setting of finding matching phages against bacterial strains. PhageHostLearn reaches a cross-validated ROC AUC of up to 81.8% in silico and maintains this performance in laboratory validation. Our approach provides a framework for developing and evaluating phage-host prediction methods that are useful in practice, which we believe to be a meaningful contribution to the machine-learning-guided development of phage therapeutics and diagnostics.

Indexed as

BacteriophagesHost SpecificityKlebsiellaMachine LearningComputer Simulation

Identifiers

PMID38778023
PMCPMC11111740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.