Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024
Channelled versus nonchannelled Macintosh videolaryngoscope blades in patients with a cervical collar: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.
Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07577648 (Comparative Study of the Channelled Blade Astra-Vue Videolaryngoscope and the Non-Channelled CMAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Airway Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparative Study of the Channelled Blade Astra-Vue Videolaryngoscope and the Non-Channelled CMAC D-Blade Videolaryngoscope in Airway Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Is remimazolam the future of sedation for regional anesthesia?Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChannelled blades have the advantage of avoiding stylet use and potential airway injury during videolaryngoscopic intubation. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of channelled Macintosh-type blades has not yet been fully established. We sought to assess the utility of channelled Macintosh-type blades for videolaryngoscopic intubation under cervical spine immobilization.
methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled noninferiority trial in neurosurgical patients with a difficult airway simulated by a cervical collar. Videolaryngoscopic intubation with a reinforced tracheal tube was performed using a channelled Macintosh-type blade without a stylet (channelled group, n = 130) or a nonchannelled Macintosh-type blade with a stylet (nonchannelled group, n = 131). The primary outcome was intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included time to intubation and incidence or severity of intubation-related complications (subglottic, lingual, and dental injuries; bleeding; sore throat; and hoarseness).
resultsThe initial intubation success rate was 98% and 99% in the channelled and nonchannelled groups, respectively, showing the noninferiority of the channelled group (difference in proportions -0.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.8% to 2.9%; predefined noninferiority margin, -5%; P = 0.62). Fewer participants in the channelled group had subglottic injuries than in the nonchannelled group (32% [32/100] vs 57% [54/95]; difference in proportions, -25%; 95% CI, -39% to -11%; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the overall intubation success rate, time to intubation, and incidence or severity of other intubation-related complications.
conclusionsFor videolaryngoscopic intubation in patients with a cervical collar, channelled Macintosh-type blades are an alternative to nonchannelled Macintosh-type blades, with a noninferior initial intubation success rate and a lower incidence of subglottic injury. STUDY REGISTRATION: CRIS.nih.go.kr ( KCT0005186 ); first submitted 29 June 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.