Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38777805›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

CoRTEx: contrastive learning for representing terms via explanations with applications on constructing biomedical knowledge graphs.

Huaiyuan Ying, Zhengyun Zhao, Yang Zhao, Sihang Zeng, Sheng Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Large language models in biomedicine and health: current research landscape and future directions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huaiyuan YingCenter for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7959-2093
Zhengyun ZhaoCenter for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9425-7752
Yang ZhaoWeiyang College, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Sihang ZengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-2921-829X
Sheng YuCenter for Statistical Science, Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality Z190024Natural Science Foundation of China 12171270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesBiomedical Knowledge Graphs play a pivotal role in various biomedical research domains. Concurrently, term clustering emerges as a crucial step in constructing these knowledge graphs, aiming to identify synonymous terms. Due to a lack of knowledge, previous contrastive learning models trained with Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) synonyms struggle at clustering difficult terms and do not generalize well beyond UMLS terms. In this work, we leverage the world knowledge from large language models (LLMs) and propose Contrastive Learning for Representing Terms via Explanations (CoRTEx) to enhance term representation and significantly improves term clustering. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe model training involves generating explanations for a cleaned subset of UMLS terms using ChatGPT. We employ contrastive learning, considering term and explanation embeddings simultaneously, and progressively introduce hard negative samples. Additionally, a ChatGPT-assisted BIRCH algorithm is designed for efficient clustering of a new ontology.

resultsWe established a clustering test set and a hard negative test set, where our model consistently achieves the highest F1 score. With CoRTEx embeddings and the modified BIRCH algorithm, we grouped 35 580 932 terms from the Biomedical Informatics Ontology System (BIOS) into 22 104 559 clusters with O(N) queries to ChatGPT. Case studies highlight the model's efficacy in handling challenging samples, aided by information from explanations.

conclusionBy aligning terms to their explanations, CoRTEx demonstrates superior accuracy over benchmark models and robustness beyond its training set, and it is suitable for clustering terms for large-scale biomedical ontologies.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingUnified Medical Language SystemBiological OntologiesBiomedical ResearchCluster AnalysisHumansTerminology as Topiccontrastive learningknowledge injectionlarge language modelsterm clustering

Identifiers

PMID38777805
PMCPMC11339518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.