Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38777594›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Medical students' attitudes towards well-being and welfare: a systematic review protocol.

Adele Mazzoleni, Sakshi Garg, Shreya Bhatia, Niraj S Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adele MazzoleniBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Sakshi GargNational Medical Research Association, London, UK.
Shreya BhatiaNational Medical Research Association, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7913-8341
Niraj S KumarNational Medical Research Association, London, UK zchauma@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMedical education poses serious stressors on medical students, as they report overall higher rates of psychiatric comorbidities compared with students enrolled in other university-level courses. The high rates of poor well-being reported should be considered a concern, as students represent the future workforce of healthcare professionals. Although there has been an increased interest towards well-being and burn-out in medical students, there is still much to be elucidated. Indeed, there is an overall lack of understanding of which attitudes medical students have towards well-being and welfare, something that could be used to develop targeted practice to improve medics' quality of life and reduce overall burn-out.This review will aim at evaluating and reporting the current research available on medical students' attitudes towards well-being and welfare. We will take into account which countries have published data on the topic, and we will analyse papers written during the COVID-19 period separately, giving this particular time frame a separate outlook. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review protocol has been developed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. A systematic search including "medical students" AND "wellbeing" AND "perceptions" was carried out on MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases. The Mixed Method Appraisal Tool will be used to assess the quality of the available studies and risk of bias. Studies will be screened using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data will be summarised narratively and in tabular forms. A narrative subgroup analysis of the COVID-19 period will be carried out, and a country-wise approach will be used to describe which areas have published relevant studies. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This will be the first systematic review looking at the reported attitudes that medical students have towards well-being and welfare. This will provide an account of the available data on the topic, and a starting point to understand where further research is needed in the future. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023471022.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalSystematic Reviews as TopicAttitude of Health PersonnelCOVID-19HumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignSARS-CoV-2Adult psychiatryBurnoutHealth Education

Identifiers

PMID38777594
PMCPMC11116847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.