Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38777582›Full record

ArticleJournal of intellectual disability research : JIDR2024

The inequity of education, health and care plan provision for children and young people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

I O Lee, J Wolstencroft, H Housby, M B M van den Bree, S J R A Chawner, J Hall, IMAGINE ID Consortium, D H Skuse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

I O LeeBehavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0004-6802
J WolstencroftBehavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6160-9731
H HousbyBehavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5770-8697
M B M van den BreeMedical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
S J R A ChawnerMedical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
J HallMedical Research Council Centre for Neuropsychiatric Genetics and Genomics, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
IMAGINE ID Consortium
D H SkuseBehavioural and Brain Sciences Unit, Population Policy and Practice Programme, Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7891-5732

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801418Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1Medical Research Council MR/L011166/1Medical Research Council MR/N022572/1Medical Research Council MR/T033045/1MRF_ MRF-154-0001-RG-SKUSEUK Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and young people (CYP) with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) have significant additional educational needs compared with the general population. In England, the government has established a system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs) to support children with special educational needs and disabilities, but disparities exist between the degree of need and the availability of support. We conducted a prospective UK national cohort study (IMAGINE) of children with rare pathogenic genomic variants, all of which are associated with IDD, to investigate associated neuropsychiatric risk. Subsequently, we obtained information from the UK's National Pupil Database on their educational progress through the state school system. We aimed to identify whether they had received EHCP provision and whether that support was associated with their family's socioeconomic status, region of domicile, ethnicity, sex, primary special educational needs (SEN) type, academic performance and mental health well-being.

methodsWe recruited 2738 CYP from England into the IMAGINE study between 2014 and 2019. The educational histories of the participants (6-28 years old, mean ± standard deviation = 14 ± 4 years, 56% male) were obtained from the Department for Education's National Pupil Database in 2021. Educational data included attainment scores from the Early Year Foundation Stage (<5 years) to key stage 4 (15-16 years). Each family was assigned an index of multiple deprivation (IMD) score based on their home address postcode. Parents or carers rated their child's emotional and behavioural adjustment on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). The association between receiving an EHCP and the child's IMD score, eligibility for free school meals, English region of domicile, ethnicity, sex, primary SEN type, academic attainment and SDQ score was investigated.

resultsIn this cohort, 78% of participants had received an EHCP. CYP living in the most deprived IMD deciles were substantially less likely to receive EHCP support than those in the least deprived decile, irrespective of their degree of intellectual developmental disability, academic performance or associated mental health problems. There were no sex differences. Children of Asian heritage were more likely to have been granted an EHCP than White children from equivalent IMD deciles. There were striking regional disparities. Participants living in London were significantly more likely to have been awarded an EHCP than participants living anywhere else in England, regardless of their IMD decile; those in the least deprived decile had almost 100% EHCP provision.

conclusionsThis study found evidence for nationwide regional inconsistencies in the awarding of EHCP to CYP with significant intellectual impairments of known genetic aetiology. Disparities in funds available to education authorities could be a contributory factor. EHCP support was potentially influenced by how strongly a parent advocates for their child.

Indexed as

Developmental DisabilitiesIntellectual DisabilityAdolescentAdultChildEducation, SpecialEnglandFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMalePatient Care PlanningProspective StudiesYoung Adulteducationhealth and care planindex of multiple deprivationinequityintellectual and developmental disabilityregions of Englandsocioeconomic status

Identifiers

PMID38777582
PMCPMC11753480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.