Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38777346›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2024

Using a new artificial intelligence-aided method to assess body composition CT segmentation in colorectal cancer patients.

Ke Cao, Josephine Yeung, Yasser Arafat, Jing Qiao, Richard Gartrell, Mobin Master, Justin M C Yeung, Paul N Baird

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning in image segmentation for cancer.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ke CaoDepartment of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-8845
Josephine YeungDepartment of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yasser ArafatDepartment of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jing QiaoDepartment of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Richard GartrellDepartment of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Mobin MasterDepartment of Radiology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Justin M C Yeung *Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Paul N Baird *Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of our own artificial intelligence (AI)-generated model to assess automated segmentation and quantification of body composition-derived computed tomography (CT) slices from the lumber (L3) region in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

methodsA total of 541 axial CT slices at the L3 vertebra were retrospectively collected from 319 patients with CRC diagnosed during 2012-2019 at a single Australian tertiary institution, Western Health in Melbourne. A two-dimensional U-Net convolutional network was trained on 338 slices to segment muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Manual reading of these same slices of muscle, VAT and SAT was created to serve as ground truth data. The Dice similarity coefficient was used to assess the U-Net-based segmentation performance on both a validation dataset (68 slices) and a test dataset (203 slices). The measurement of cross-sectional area and Hounsfield unit (HU) density of muscle, VAT and SAT were compared between two methods.

resultsThe segmentation for muscle, VAT and SAT demonstrated excellent performance for both the validation (Dice similarity coefficients >0.98, respectively) and test (Dice similarity coefficients >0.97, respectively) datasets. There was a strong positive correlation between manual and AI segmentation measurements of body composition for both datasets (Spearman's correlation coefficients: 0.944-0.999, P < 0.001).

conclusionsCompared to the gold standard, this fully automated segmentation system exhibited a high accuracy for assessing segmentation and quantification of abdominal muscle and adipose tissues of CT slices at the L3 in CRC patients.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBody CompositionColorectal NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntra-Abdominal FatMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceautomated segmentationbody compositioncolorectal cancercomputed tomography

Identifiers

PMID38777346
PMCPMC11638354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.