Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38776990›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery2025

Radiologic Outcomes after Operative Management of Traumatic Spine Fractures: Stand-Alone Posterior Stabilization versus Combined Anteroposterior Approach.

Ali Mulhem, Ziad Omran, Stefanie Hammersen, Sven Rainer Kantelhardt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Posterior-only versus combined anterior-posterior approaches for thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali MulhemDepartment for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-610X
Ziad OmranDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie HammersenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.
Sven Rainer KantelhardtDepartment of Neurosurgery, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research emphasizes correcting deformities resulting from spine fractures by restoring sagittal alignment and vertebral height. This study aims to compare radiologic outcomes, including sagittal index (SI) and loss of vertebral body height (LVBH), between stand-alone posterior stabilization (group I) and the posteroanterior/combined approach (group II) in the operative management of traumatic thoracic or lumbar spine fractures.In this retrospective single-center study, all patients with traumatic spine fractures (T1-L5) undergoing surgical stabilization between January 1, 2015, and May 31, 2021, were included. Two spine surgeons independently assessed imaging, recording the SI and LVBH values at baseline, after each surgical intervention, and during follow-up (at least 3 months posttreatment). The mean SI and LVBH values between the assessing surgeons were utilized. Linear mixed-effects regression models, adjusted to baseline values, compared the SI and the LVBH values between the two groups.In all, 71 patients (42 men), with the median age of 38 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 28-54) and median follow-up of 4 months (IQR: 3-17), were included. Thirty-two patients were in group I and 39 patients were in group II. Forty fractures included the thoracolumbar junction (T12 or L1), 15 affected the thoracic spine, and 14 the lumbar spine. The regression model revealed superior sagittal alignment in group II, with an adjusted mean difference for SI of -4.24 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.13 to -1.36;

Indexed as

Fracture Fixation, InternalLumbar VertebraeSpinal FracturesSpinal FusionThoracic VertebraeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38776990
PMCPMC12513764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.