ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Modeling of spatiotemporal dynamics of ligand-coated particle flow in targeted drug delivery processes.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart CAR-T Nanosymbionts: archetypes and proto-models.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Nanocarriers for targeted drug delivery in the vascular system: focus on endothelium.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Effect of Circadian Rhythm Modulated Blood Flow on Nanoparticle based Targeted Drug Delivery in VirtualbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nanoparticles tethered with vasculature-binding epitopes have been used to deliver the drug into injured or diseased tissues via the bloodstream. However, the extent that blood flow dynamics affects nanoparticle retention at the target site after adhesion needs to be better understood. This knowledge gap potentially underlies significantly different therapeutic efficacies between animal models and humans. An experimentally validated mathematical model that accurately simulates the effects of blood flow on nanoparticle adhesion and retention, thus circumventing the limitations of conventional trial-and-error-based drug design in animal models, is lacking. This paper addresses this technical bottleneck and presents an integrated mathematical method that derives heavily from a unique combination of a mechanics-based dispersion model for nanoparticle transport and diffusion in the boundary layers, an asperity model to account for surface roughness of endothelium, and an experimentally calibrated stochastic nanoparticle-cell adhesion model to describe nanoparticle adhesion and subsequent retention at the target site under external flow. PLGA-
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.