Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38776324›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The in vitro assessment of rheological properties and dentin remineralization of saliva substitutes containing propolis and aloe vera extracts.

Surapong Srisomboon, Thanapong Intharah, Ungkarn Jarujareet, Arnit Toneluck, Piyaphong Panpisut

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The Potential ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Classification and Anti-Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Surapong SrisomboonFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Thanapong IntharahVisual Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0965-680X
Ungkarn JarujareetNECTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3593-5733
Arnit ToneluckFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.
Piyaphong PanpisutFaculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8649-857X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Saliva substitutes with enhanced dentin remineralization properties were expected to help manage caries progression in patients with xerostomia. This in vitro study examined the rheological properties and remineralization action of experimental saliva substitutes containing propolis extract and aloe vera extract on demineralized dentin. Four experimental saliva substitutes were formulated with varying concentrations of propolis extract (P) and aloe vera extract (A) were prepared. A commercial saliva substitute (Biotene Oral Rinse) was used as a commercial comparison. The rheological properties and viscosity of these materials were measured using a strain-controlled rheometer (n = 3). The remineralizing actions of saliva substitutes on demineralized dentin after 2 weeks were determined using ATR-FTIR and SEM-EDX (n = 8). The results were expressed as a percentage increase in the mineral-to-matrix ratio. Biotene demonstrated a significantly higher viscosity (13.5 mPa·s) than experimental saliva substitutes (p<0.05). The addition of extracts increased the viscosity of the saliva substitutes from 4.7 mPa·s to 5.2 mPa·s. All formulations showed minimal shear thinning behavior, which was the viscoelastic properties of natural saliva. The formulation containing 5 wt% of propolis exhibited the highest increase in the median mineral-to-matrix ratio (25.48%). The SEM-EDX analysis revealed substantial mineral precipitation in demineralized dentin, especially in formulations with 5 wt% or 2.5 wt% of propolis. The effect of the aloe vera extract was minimal. The addition of propolis and aloe vera extracts increased the viscosity of saliva substitutes. the addition of propolis for 2.5 or 5 wt% to saliva substitutes increased mineral apatite precipitation and tubule occlusion. To conclude, the saliva substitute containing propolis extract demonstrated superior remineralizing actions compared with those containing only aloe vera extract.

Indexed as

AloeDentinPlant ExtractsPropolisRheologySaliva, ArtificialHumansSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTooth RemineralizationViscosityPlant ExtractsPropolisSaliva, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID38776324
PMCPMC11111055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.