ArticleACS applied bio materials2024
Materials Characterization of Stereolithography 3D Printed Polymer to Develop a Self-Driven Microfluidic Device for Bioanalytical Applications.
Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D Printable and Electrically Conductive Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Cardiac and Vascular Tissue Engineering Applications.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Review
- Influence of Additive Manufacturing Parameters and Surface Treatments on Wettability of VPP Acrylic Resins.Polymers · 2026Article
- 3D bioprinting of microfluidic systems for cardiac regenerative medicine: from biofabrication to organ-on-a-chip.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Recent advances in 3D printing for biochemical and environmental analysis.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Review
- SLA-Printed BaTiOACS omega · 2025Article
- 3D Multi-Tissue microphysiological system for Anti-Cancer and cardiotoxicity drug screening with automated image analysis.Discover applied sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stereolithography (SLA) 3D printing is a rapid prototyping technique and reproducible manufacturing platform, which makes it a useful tool to develop advanced microfluidic devices for bioanalytical applications. However, limited information exists regarding the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the photocured polymers printed with SLA. This study demonstrates the characterization of a commercially available SLA 3D printed polymer to evaluate the potential presence of any time-dependent changes in material properties that may affect its ability to produce functional, capillary-action microfluidic devices. The printed polymer was analyzed with Fourier transform infrared-attenuated total reflectance, contact angle measurements, tensile test, impact test, scanning electron microscopy, and fluid flow analysis. Polymer biocompatibility was assessed with propidium iodide flow cytometry and an MTT assay for cell viability. The material characterization and biocompatibility results were then implemented to design and fabricate a self-driven capillary action microfluidic device for future use as a bioanalytical assay. This study demonstrates temporally stable mechanical properties and biocompatibility of the SLA polymer. However, surface characterization through contact angle measurements shows the polymer's wettability changes over time which indicates there is a limited postprinting period when the polymer can be used for capillary-based fluid flow. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of implementing SLA as a high-throughput manufacturing method for capillary action microfluidic devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.