Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38776213›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2024

Introducing a machine learning algorithm for delirium prediction-the Supporting SURgery with GEriatric Co-Management and AI project (SURGE-Ahead).

Samuel Benovic, Anna H Ajlani, Christoph Leinert, Marina Fotteler, Dennis Wolf, Florian Steger, Hans Kestler, Dhayana Dallmeier, Michael Denkinger, Gerhard W Eschweiler and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Samuel BenovicInstitute of Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Anna H AjlaniInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Christoph LeinertInstitute of Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Marina FottelerAgaplesion Bethesda Clinic Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Dennis WolfInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Florian StegerInstitute of the History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Hans KestlerInstitute of Medical Systems Biology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany.
Dhayana DallmeierInstitute of Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Michael DenkingerInstitute of Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.
Gerhard W EschweilerGeriatric Center, University Hospital Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany.
Christine ThomasDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Germany.
Thomas D KocarInstitute of Geriatric Research, Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-5842-5146

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01GY2101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPost-operative delirium (POD) is a common complication in older patients, with an incidence of 14-56%. To implement preventative procedures, it is necessary to identify patients at risk for POD. In the present study, we aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model for POD prediction in older patients, in close cooperation with the PAWEL (patient safety, cost-effectiveness and quality of life in elective surgery) project.

methodsThe model was trained on the PAWEL study's dataset of 878 patients (no intervention, age ≥ 70, 209 with POD). Presence of POD was determined by the Confusion Assessment Method and a chart review. We selected 15 features based on domain knowledge, ethical considerations and a recursive feature elimination. A logistic regression and a linear support vector machine (SVM) were trained, and evaluated using receiver operator characteristics (ROC).

resultsThe selected features were American Society of Anesthesiologists score, multimorbidity, cut-to-suture time, estimated glomerular filtration rate, polypharmacy, use of cardio-pulmonary bypass, the Montreal cognitive assessment subscores 'memory', 'orientation' and 'verbal fluency', pre-existing dementia, clinical frailty scale, age, recent falls, post-operative isolation and pre-operative benzodiazepines. The linear SVM performed best, with an ROC area under the curve of 0.82 [95% CI 0.78-0.85] in the training set, 0.81 [95% CI 0.71-0.88] in the test set and 0.76 [95% CI 0.71-0.79] in a cross-centre validation.

conclusionWe present a clinically useful and explainable ML model for POD prediction. The model will be deployed in the Supporting SURgery with GEriatric Co-Management and AI project.

Indexed as

DeliriumGeriatric AssessmentMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSupport Vector Machinedelirium predictionexplainable artificial intelligence (AI)machine learningolder peoplepost-operative deliriumsupport vector machine

Identifiers

PMID38776213
PMCPMC11110913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.