Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38776109›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Prediction of Visual Outcome After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.

Hui Guo, Chubin Ou, Guangyi Wang, Bingxing Lu, Xinyu Li, Tinghua Yang, Jinglin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Current Topics in OCT Applications in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Early Photoreceptor Alterations After Retinal Detachment Repair.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hui GuoGuangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Chubin OuDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Guangyi WangDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Bingxing LuGuangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinyu LiGuangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Tinghua YangGuangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinglin ZhangGuangzhou Aier Eye Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to develop artificial intelligence models for predicting postoperative functional outcomes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective review and data extraction were conducted on 184 patients diagnosed with RRD who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and gas tamponade. The primary outcome was the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at three months after the surgery. Those with a BCVA of less than 6/18 Snellen acuity were classified into a vision impairment group. A deep learning model was developed using presurgical predictors, including ultra-widefield fundus images, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the macular region, age, gender, and preoperative BCVA. A fusion method was used to capture the interaction between different modalities during model construction. Results: Among the participants, 74 (40%) still had vision impairment after the treatment. There were significant differences in age, gender, presurgical BCVA, intraocular pressure, macular detachment, and extension of retinal detachment between the vision impairment and vision non-impairment groups. The multimodal fusion model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91, with a mean accuracy of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.94, and specificity of 0.80. Heatmaps revealed that the macular involvement was the most active area, as observed in both the OCT and ultra-widefield images. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that artificial intelligence techniques can achieve a high AUC for predicting functional outcomes after RRD surgery, even with a small sample size. Machine learning methods identified The macular region as the most active region. Translational Relevance: Multimodal fusion models have the potential to assist clinicians in predicting postoperative visual outcomes prior to undergoing PPV.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRetinal DetachmentTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyAdultAgedDeep LearningEndotamponadeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID38776109
PMCPMC11127492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.