ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024
Prediction of Visual Outcome After Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Surgery Using Artificial Intelligence Techniques.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced Preoperative Imaging in Macula-Off Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: Emerging Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights for Clinical Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Transcriptomic Profiling of the Human Retina Reveals Inflammatory and Metabolic Signatures Associated With Clinical Severity After Retinal Detachment.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Vitreoretinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Review
- Current Topics in OCT Applications in Vitreoretinal Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Early Photoreceptor Alterations After Retinal Detachment Repair.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography in Retinal Detachment: Prognostic Biomarkers, Surgical Planning, and Postoperative Monitoring.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence for posterior capsule opacification.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Functional Outcome of Chandelier-Assisted Scleral Buckling in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
- Multimodal machine learning for predicting postoperative functional outcomes in surgically treated supratentorial deep intracerebral hemorrhage: a prospective multicenter study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop artificial intelligence models for predicting postoperative functional outcomes in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Methods: A retrospective review and data extraction were conducted on 184 patients diagnosed with RRD who underwent pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and gas tamponade. The primary outcome was the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at three months after the surgery. Those with a BCVA of less than 6/18 Snellen acuity were classified into a vision impairment group. A deep learning model was developed using presurgical predictors, including ultra-widefield fundus images, structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) images of the macular region, age, gender, and preoperative BCVA. A fusion method was used to capture the interaction between different modalities during model construction. Results: Among the participants, 74 (40%) still had vision impairment after the treatment. There were significant differences in age, gender, presurgical BCVA, intraocular pressure, macular detachment, and extension of retinal detachment between the vision impairment and vision non-impairment groups. The multimodal fusion model achieved a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91, with a mean accuracy of 0.86, sensitivity of 0.94, and specificity of 0.80. Heatmaps revealed that the macular involvement was the most active area, as observed in both the OCT and ultra-widefield images. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrates that artificial intelligence techniques can achieve a high AUC for predicting functional outcomes after RRD surgery, even with a small sample size. Machine learning methods identified The macular region as the most active region. Translational Relevance: Multimodal fusion models have the potential to assist clinicians in predicting postoperative visual outcomes prior to undergoing PPV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.