ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2024
Sex Differences in Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis: Unraveling the Complexities in Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis in Women: Underdiagnosis, Sex-Specific Phenotypic Expression and Therapeutic Response.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Gender-Specific Differences in Diastolic Dysfunction and HFpEF: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) is characterised by the deposition of transthyretin amyloid fibrils in the heart. ATTR-CA affects both men and women although there is evidence of sex differences in prevalence and clinical presentation. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review paper aims to comprehensively examine and synthesise the existing literature on sex differences in ATTR-CA. RECENT
findingsThe prevalence of ATTR-CA is higher in males although the male predominance is more apparent in older patients in the wild type form and in TTR genetic variants that predominantly result in a cardiac phenotype in the hereditary variant. Women tend to have less left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and a higher ejection fraction at clinical presentation which may contribute to a later diagnosis although the prognosis appears to be similar in both sexes. Female sex is a predictor of a good response to tafamidis 20 mg in TTR polyneuropathy but otherwise there are no data on sex differences in the efficacy of other treatments for ATTR-CA. It is crucial to define specific sex differences in ATTR-CA. A lower cut-off value for LVH in women may be needed to improve diagnosis. It is necessary to increase female representation in clinical trials to better understand possible sex differences in therapeutic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38775878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.