Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38775822›Full record

Observational studyArchives of women's mental health2024

Predicting first time depression onset in pregnancy: applying machine learning methods to patient-reported data.

Tamar Krishnamurti, Samantha Rodriguez, Bryan Wilder, Priya Gopalan, Hyagriv N Simhan

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of women's mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Targeted Research and Treatment Implications in Women With Depression.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tamar KrishnamurtiDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Pl, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. tamark@pitt.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-3416-2230
Samantha RodriguezDivision of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 230 McKee Pl, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Bryan WilderMachine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Priya GopalanUPMC Western Psychiatric Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Hyagriv N SimhanDepartment of OB-GYN and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.

Funding

Peripartum Depression Prevention: Algorithmic Identification and Digital SolutionsR34MH130950 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KRISHNAMURTI, TAMAR · 2022 to 2024
$536k
NIMH NIH HHS 5R34 MH130950NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH130950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a machine learning algorithm, using patient-reported data from early pregnancy, to predict later onset of first time moderate-to-severe depression.

methodsA sample of 944 U.S. patient participants from a larger longitudinal observational cohortused a prenatal support mobile app from September 2019 to April 2022. Participants self-reported clinical and social risk factors during first trimester initiation of app use and completed voluntary depression screenings in each trimester. Several machine learning algorithms were applied to self-reported data, including a novel algorithm for causal discovery. Training and test datasets were built from a randomized 80/20 data split. Models were evaluated on their predictive accuracy and their simplicity (i.e., fewest variables required for prediction).

resultsAmong participants, 78% identified as white with an average age of 30 [IQR 26-34]; 61% had income ≥ $50,000; 70% had a college degree or higher; and 49% were nulliparous. All models accurately predicted first time moderate-severe depression using first trimester baseline data (AUC 0.74-0.89, sensitivity 0.35-0.81, specificity 0.78-0.95). Several predictors were common across models, including anxiety history, partnered status, psychosocial factors, and pregnancy-specific stressors. The optimal model used only 14 (26%) of the possible variables and had excellent accuracy (AUC = 0.89, sensitivity = 0.81, specificity = 0.83). When food insecurity reports were included among a subset of participants, demographics, including race and income, dropped out and the model became more accurate (AUC = 0.93) and simpler (9 variables).

conclusionA relatively small amount of self-report data produced a highly predictive model of first time depression among pregnant individuals.

Indexed as

DepressionMachine LearningSelf ReportAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMobile ApplicationsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimester, FirstRisk FactorsUnited StatesDepressionMachine learningMhealthPregnancyRisk predictionSocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID38775822
PMCPMC11579171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.