ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
GateMeClass: Gate Mining and Classification of cytometry data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCytometry comprises powerful techniques for analyzing the cell heterogeneity of a biological sample by examining the expression of protein markers. These technologies impact especially the field of oncoimmunology, where cell identification is essential to analyze the tumor microenvironment. Several classification tools have been developed for the annotation of cytometry datasets, which include supervised tools that require a training set as a reference (i.e. reference-based) and semisupervised tools based on the manual definition of a marker table. The latter is closer to the traditional annotation of cytometry data based on manual gating. However, they require the manual definition of a marker table that cannot be extracted automatically in a reference-based fashion. Therefore, we are lacking methods that allow both classification approaches while maintaining the high biological interpretability given by the marker table.
resultsWe present a new tool called GateMeClass (Gate Mining and Classification) which overcomes the limitation of the current methods of classification of cytometry data allowing both semisupervised and supervised annotation based on a marker table that can be defined manually or extracted from an external annotated dataset. We measured the accuracy of GateMeClass for annotating three well-established benchmark mass cytometry datasets and one flow cytometry dataset. The performance of GateMeClass is comparable to reference-based methods and marker table-based techniques, offering greater flexibility and rapid execution times. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GateMeClass is implemented in R language and is publicly available at https://github.com/simo1c/GateMeClass.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.