Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38775662›Full record

ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024

External stenting for saphenous vein grafts reduces early postoperative graft failure.

Stak Dushaj, Achim Häussler, Laura Rings, Vasileios Ntinopoulos, Nestoras Papadopoulos, Dragan Odavic, Hector Rodriguez Cetina Biefer, Omer Dzemali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stak DushajDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0009-0002-8623-2306
Achim HäusslerDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Laura RingsDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4434-2507
Vasileios NtinopoulosDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8573-1018
Nestoras PapadopoulosDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dragan OdavicDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Hector Rodriguez Cetina BieferDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5855-8993
Omer DzemaliDepartment for Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7910-5152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMultiple studies have shown that external stenting (ExSt) mitigates the progression of vein graft disease years after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We used computed tomography to evaluate the effect of ExSt on perioperative vein graft patency.

methodsThis study assessed graft patency rates of saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in consecutive patients with isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between 2018 and 2021. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to compare the outcomes of supported and non-supported groups at both patient and graft levels, with age, EuroSCORE II, gender, diabetes and arterial grafts as covariates. Subgroup analyses were performed based on different covariates. The goal of the study was to provide valuable insights into the clinical outcomes of SVG in patients having CABG.

resultsThe study examined a total of 357 patients who met the inclusion criteria and evaluated 572 vein grafts. Of these, 150 patients (205 SVGs) received ExSt, whereas 207 patients (337 SVGs) did not receive ExSt. The study results indicated that the likelihood of overall SVG patency at discharge was higher in the stented group than in the non-stented group, both at the level of the grafts [93.8% vs 87.8%, odds ratio (OR) 2.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0-4.5; P = 0.05] and at the patient level (90.1% vs 83.5%, OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.9-3.6; P = 0.1). It is worth noting that the difference between the stented and non-stented groups was most significant in the subgroup that received 2 arterial grafts (96.5% vs 89.6%, OR 3.2; 95% CI 1.2-8.4; P = 0.02) and in the subgroup with a higher EuroSCORE II (median >1.1) (98.6% vs 88.6%, OR 8.8; 95% CI 1.1-72.7; P = 0.04).

conclusionsThe ExSt is associated with improved perioperative SVG patency at both the graft and the patient levels. Moreover, SVGs to the right territory and high-risk patients appear to have an advantage using ExSt.

Indexed as

CABGComputed tomographyExternal stentingGraft patencyVein grafts

Identifiers

PMID38775662
PMCPMC11162150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.