Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38775467›Full record

ArticlemSphere2024

What's on a prophage: analysis of

Caroline R Yates, Anthony Nguyen, Jingqiu Liao, Rachel A Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Biofilmomics of Antimicrobial-ResistantAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Know Your Enemy:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  12. Prokaryotic homeostasis - a solution to thrive and survive.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Caroline R YatesDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Anthony NguyenComputational Modeling and Data Analytics Program, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Jingqiu LiaoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
Rachel A ChengDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5932-7011

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gain of mobile elements, such as prophages, can introduce cargo to the recipient bacterium that could facilitate its persistence in or expansion to a new environment, such as a host. While previous studies have focused on identifying and characterizing the genetic diversity of prophages, analyses characterizing the cargo that prophages carry have not been extensively explored. We characterized prophage regions from 303 IMPORTANCE: Lysogenic bacteriophages (phages) can integrate their genome into a bacterial host's genome, potentially introducing genetic elements that can affect the fitness of the host bacterium. The functions of prophage-encoded genes are important to understand as these genes could be mobilized and transferred to a new host. Using a large genomic dataset representing >300 isolates from all known subspecies and species of

Indexed as

Genome, BacterialProphagesSalmonellaGenetic VariationSalmonella PhagesVirulenceantimicrobial resistance genesbacteriophageprophageSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID38775467
PMCPMC11332146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.