Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38775204›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2024

Safety and effectiveness of apremilast in Japanese patients with psoriatic disease: Results of a post-marketing surveillance study.

Mamitaro Ohtsuki, Yukari Okubo, Hidehisa Saeki, Atsuyuki Igarashi, Shinichi Imafuku, Masatoshi Abe, Siddharth Chaudhari, Masafumi Yaguchi, Ayumi Emoto, Akimichi Morita

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03284879 (OTEZLA® Tablets Drug Use-Results Survey), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03284879 completednot on this map

OTEZLA® Tablets Drug Use-Results Survey

TypeobservationalSponsorAmgenRan2017 to 2022Enrolled1,086ConditionsPsoriasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mamitaro OhtsukiDepartment of Dermatology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7845-6698
Yukari OkuboDepartment of Dermatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9526-1259
Hidehisa SaekiDepartment of Dermatology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1095-0355
Atsuyuki IgarashiIgarashi Dermatology Higashi-Gotanda Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinichi ImafukuDepartment of Dermatology, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-4349
Masatoshi AbeKojinkai Sapporo Skin Clinic, Sapporo, Japan.
Siddharth ChaudhariAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Masafumi YaguchiAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi EmotoAmgen K.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Akimichi MoritaDepartment of Geriatric and Environmental Dermatology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Aichi, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-3754

Funding

Amgen K.K.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of apremilast in psoriatic disease has been demonstrated in clinical trials, including in Japanese patients. This post-marketing surveillance study was conducted after approval of apremalast in Japan in 2016 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the drug in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in routine clinical practice. Patients (enrolled between September 1, 2017, and August 31, 2019), were observed for 12 months after apremilast treatment initiation or until discontinuation or withdrawal. Safety was assessed by evaluating adverse reactions (ARs) and serious ARs. Effectiveness measures in PsO included the proportion of patients who achieved global improvement and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scores of 0/1 and the change from baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) after 6 and 12 months treatment. The safety analysis set included 1063 patients (PsO, n = 992; PsA, n = 127). ARs and serious ARs were reported in 29.4% and 0.7% of patients, respectively; most occurred <1 month after apremilast initiation. There were no reports of fatal ARs, serious infections, hypersensitivity, or vasculitis. No new safety signals were identified. Among the key survey items, gastrointestinal disorders were the most common ARs (21.3%). In patients with PsO, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, effectiveness rates of achieving highly effective or effective global improvement of were 90.9% and 93.8%; PGA 0/1 was achieved by 42.7% and 58.1% of patients; mean decrease from baseline in total DLQI score was 4.2 (p < 0.0001) and 5.7 (p < 0.0001), respectively. Effectiveness was evaluated in a small number of patients with PsA for some measures; after 6 and 12 months of treatment, improvements were observed in global improvement effectiveness rates, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints score, Visual Analog Scale score, and DLQI score. We conclude that orally administered apremilast was well tolerated and effective in Japanese patients with PsO and/or PsA enrolled in this post-marketing surveillance study.

Indexed as

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingPsoriasisThalidomideAdultAgedArthritis, PsoriaticEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalapremilastThalidomideapremilastplaque psoriasispost‐marketing surveillancepsoriatic arthritissafety

Identifiers

PMID38775204
PMCPMC11484125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.