Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38775190›Full record

ArticleACS sensors2024

Dual-Frequency, Ratiometric Approaches to EAB Sensor Interrogation Support the Calibration-Free Measurement of Specific Molecules In Vivo.

Elsi Verrinder, Julian Gerson, Kaylyn Leung, Tod E Kippin, Kevin W Plaxco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sensors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elsi VerrinderDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-7296
Julian GersonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Kaylyn LeungDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Tod E KippinDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.
Kevin W PlaxcoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4772-8771

Funding

Bio-electrochemical detectors for in vivo continuous monitoringR01EB022015 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI KIPPIN, TOD EDWARD, PLAXCO, KEVIN W · 2017 to 2025
$4.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrochemical aptamer-based (EAB) sensors represent the first molecular measurement technology that is both (1) independent of the chemical reactivity of the target, and thus generalizable to many targets and (2) able to function in an accurate, drift-corrected manner in situ in the living body. Signaling in EAB sensors is generated when an electrode-bound aptamer binds to its target ligand, altering the rate of electron transfer from an attached redox reporter and producing an easily detectable change in peak current when the sensor is interrogated using square wave voltammetry. Due to differences in the microscopic surface area of the interrogating electrodes, the baseline peak currents obtained from EAB sensors, however, can be highly variable. To overcome this, we have historically performed single-point calibration using measurements performed in a single sample of known target concentration. Here, however, we explore approaches to EAB sensor operation that negate the need to perform even single-point calibration of individual sensors. These are a ratiometric approach employing the ratio of the peak currents observed at two distinct square wave frequencies, and a kinetic differential measurement approach that employs the difference between peak currents seen at the two frequencies. Using in vivo measurements of vancomycin and phenylalanine as our test bed, we compared the output of these methods with that of the same sensor when single-point calibration was employed. Doing so we find that both methods support accurately drift-corrected measurements in vivo in live rats, even when employing rather crudely handmade devices. By removing the need to calibrate each individual sensor in a sample of known target concentration, these interrogation methods should significantly simplify the use of EAB sensors for in vivo applications.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideBiosensing TechniquesElectrochemical TechniquesAnimalsCalibrationElectrodesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVancomycinAptamers, NucleotideVancomycinaptamerscalibration freeelectrochemistryin vivokinetic differential measurementsquare wave voltammetry

Identifiers

PMID38775190
PMCPMC11821477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.