Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38775019›Full record

SynthesisJournal of periodontal research2024

Relationship between oral microbiota and colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Sara Camañes-Gonzalvo, José María Montiel-Company, Miriam Lobo-de-Mena, María José Safont-Aguilera, Amaya Fernández-Diaz, Andrés López-Roldán, Vanessa Paredes-Gallardo, Carlos Bellot-Arcís

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of periodontal research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Tongue-coating microbiome as a predictor of solid tumors: an updated scoping review of clinical studies.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Streptococcus anginosus: the potential role in the progression of gastric cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. NO: a key player in microbiome dynamics and cancer pathogenesis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara Camañes-GonzalvoDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3681-8122
José María Montiel-CompanyDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3952-7681
Miriam Lobo-de-MenaMedical Oncology Department, Consortium of the General University Hospital of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8249-7721
María José Safont-AguileraMedical Oncology Department, Consortium of the General University Hospital of Valencia, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Amaya Fernández-DiazMedical Oncology Department, Requena General Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Andrés López-RoldánDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9335-5948
Vanessa Paredes-GallardoDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4137-5808
Carlos Bellot-ArcísDepartment of Stomatology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4363-2713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This systematic review aims to investigate the microbial basis underlying the association between oral microbiota and colorectal cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted across four databases, encompassing potentially relevant studies published up to April 2024 related to the PECO question: "Is there a differentiation in oral microbial composition between adult patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer compared to healthy patients?". The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the studies included. The level of evidence was assessed through the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) tool. Sixteen studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Based on low to moderate evidence profile, high levels of certain subspecies within Firmicutes (such as Streptococcus anginosus, Peptostreptococcus stomatis, S. koreensis, and S. gallolyticus), Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Neisseria oralis were found to be associated with colorectal cancer. Conversely, certain bacteria (e.g., Lachnospiraceae, F. periodonticum, and P. melaninogenica) could exert a symbiotic protective effect against colorectal cancer. Based on existing evidence, it appears that variations in oral microbiota composition exist among individuals with and without colorectal cancer. However, further research is necessary to determine the mechanisms of oral dysbiosis in colorectal carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMicrobiotaMouthDysbiosisHumanscolorectal canceroral microbiotaoral microorganismsoral pathogensperiodontal pathogens

Identifiers

PMID38775019
PMCPMC11626693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.