ArticleCurrent protocols2024
Validation of Single-Nucleotide Mosaic Variants Through Droplet Digital PCR.
Article in Current protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-level mosaic variants causing the pancreatic disease congenital hyperinsulinism can be detected from blood DNA.EBioMedicine · 2026Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic mutation detection by the SMaHT Network.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive benchmarking of somatic structural variant detection at ultra-low allele fractions.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The detection, validation, and subsequent interpretation of potentially mosaic single-nucleotide variants (SNV) within next-generation sequencing data remains a challenge in both research and clinical laboratory settings. The ability to identify mosaic variants in high genome coverage sequencing data at levels of ≤1% underscores the necessity for developing guidelines and best practices to verify these variants orthogonally. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has proven to be a powerful and precise method that allows for the determination of low-level variant fractions within a given sample. Herein we describe two precise ddPCR methods using either a fluorescent TaqMan hydrolysis probe approach or an EvaGreen fluorescent dye protocol. The TaqMan approach relies on two different fluorescent probes (FAM and HEX/VIC), each designed to amplify selectively only in the presence of a single nucleotide change denoting the variant or reference position. The fractional abundance is then calculated to determine the relative quantities of both alleles in the final sample. The EvaGreen protocol relies on two independent reactions with oligonucleotide primers designed with the single nucleotide change denoting the variant at the penultimate position of the primer. The relative amplification efficiency of both primer sets (reference and variant) can be compared to determine the mosaic level of a given variant. As the cost of high-coverage sequencing continues to decrease, the identification of potentially mosaic variants will also increase. The approaches outlined will allow clinicians and researchers a more precise determination of the true mosaic level of a given variant allowing them to better assess not only its potential pathogenicity but also its possible recurrence risk when offering genetic counseling to families. © 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol: Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with TaqMan hydrolysis probes Alternate Protocol: EvaGreen oligonucleotide-specific ddPCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.