Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774878›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Distinct T cell responsiveness to different COVID-19 vaccines and cross-reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 variants with age and CMV status.

Jolanda Brummelman, Sara Suárez-Hernández, Lia de Rond, Marjan Bogaard-van Maurik, Petra Molenaar, Emma van Wijlen, Debbie Oomen, Lisa Beckers, Nynke Y Rots, Josine van Beek and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jolanda BrummelmanCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Sara Suárez-HernándezCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Lia de RondCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Marjan Bogaard-van MaurikCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Petra MolenaarCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Emma van WijlenCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Debbie OomenCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Lisa BeckersCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Nynke Y RotsCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Josine van BeekCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Mioara A NicolaieCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Cécile A C M van ElsCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Mardi C BoerCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Patricia KaaijkCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Anne-Marie BuismanCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.
Jelle de WitCenter for Infectious Disease Control, Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Accumulating evidence indicates the importance of T cell immunity in vaccination-induced protection against severe COVID-19 disease, especially against SARS-CoV-2 Variants-of-Concern (VOCs) that more readily escape from recognition by neutralizing antibodies. However, there is limited knowledge on the T cell responses across different age groups and the impact of CMV status after primary and booster vaccination with different vaccine combinations. Moreover, it remains unclear whether age has an effect on the ability of T cells to cross-react against VOCs. Methods: Therefore, we interrogated the Spike-specific T cell responses in healthy adults of the Dutch population across different ages, whom received different vaccine types for the primary series and/or booster vaccination, using IFNɣ ELISpot. Cells were stimulated with overlapping peptide pools of the ancestral Spike protein and different VOCs. Results: Robust Spike-specific T cell responses were detected in the vast majority of participants upon the primary vaccination series, regardless of the vaccine type (i.e. BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, or Ad26.COV2.S). Clearly, in the 70+ age group, responses were overall lower and showed more variation compared to younger age groups. Only in CMV-seropositive older adults (>70y) there was a significant inverse relation of age with T cell responses. Although T cell responses increased in all age groups after booster vaccination, Spike-specific T cell frequencies remained lower in the 70+ age group. Regardless of age or CMV status, primary mRNA-1273 vaccination followed by BNT162b2 booster vaccination showed limited booster effect compared to the BNT162b2/BNT162b2 or BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 primary-booster regimen. A modest reduction in cross-reactivity to the Alpha, Delta and Omicron BA.1, but not the Beta or Gamma variant, was observed after primary vaccination. Discussion: Together, this study shows that age, CMV status, but also the primary-booster vaccination regimen influence the height of the vaccination-induced Spike-specific T cell response, but did not impact the VOC cross-reactivity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Cross ReactionsSARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusT-Lymphocytes2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesCytomegalovirus2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBNT162 VaccineChAdOx1 nCoV-19COVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2ageCMVCOVID-19cross-reactivitymRNAT cell responsevaccineVOCs

Identifiers

PMID38774878
PMCPMC11106399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.