Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774824›Full record

ArticleAEM education and training2024

The MIDAS touch: Frameworks for procedural model innovation and validation.

Stephanie N Stapleton, Michael Cassara, Benjamin Roth, Christina Matulis, Clare Desmond, Ambrose H Wong, Annemarie Cardell, Tiffany Moadel, Charles Lei, Brendan W Munzer and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AEM education and training, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephanie N StapletonDepartment of Emergency Medicine Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1593-1943
Michael CassaraDepartment of Emergency Medicine North Shore University Hospital, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health Patient Safety Institute/Emergency Medical Institute Hempstead New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6483-4838
Benjamin RothDepartment of Emergency Medicine Prisma Health Upstate University of South Carolina School of Medicine at Greenville Greenville South Carolina USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9339-6523
Christina MatulisDivision of Emergency Medicine NorthShore University Health System Evanston Illinois USA.
Clare DesmondDivision of Emergency Medicine NorthShore University Health System Evanston Illinois USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1869-1893
Ambrose H WongDepartment of Emergency Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7471-1647
Annemarie CardellMaimonides Medical Center Brooklyn New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6847-9909
Tiffany MoadelDonald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell Hempstead New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6326-209X
Charles LeiDepartment of Emergency Medicine Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis MN USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0412-4372
Brendan W MunzerDepartment of Emergency Medicine Trinity Health Ann Arbor Ann Arbor Michigan USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9100-1409
Hillary MossDepartment of Emergency Medicine Montefiore Medical Center Moses Campus, Einstein College of Medicine Bronx New York USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3293-7053
Nur Ain NadirDepartment of Clinical Sciences Kaiser Permanente Bernard Tyson School of Medicine Pasadena California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-3880

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Simulation-based procedural practice is crucial to emergency medicine skills training and maintenance. However, many commercial procedural models are either nonexistent or lacking in key elements. Simulationists often create their own novel models with minimal framework for designing, building, and validation. We propose two interlinked frameworks with the goal to systematically build and validate models for the desired educational outcomes. Methods: Simulation Academy Research Committee and members with novel model development expertise assembled as the MIDAS (Model Innovation, Development and Assessment for Simulation) working group. This working group focused on improving novel model creation and validation beginning with a preconference workshop at 2023 Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Annual Meeting. The MIDAS group sought to (1) assess the current state of novel model validation and (2) develop frameworks for the broader simulation community to create, improve, and validate procedural models. Findings: Workshop participants completed 17 surveys for a response rate of 100%. Many simulationists have created models but few have validated them. The most common barriers to validation were lack of standardized guidelines and familiarity with the validation process.We have combined principles from education and engineering fields into two interlinked frameworks. The first is centered on steps involved with model creation and refinement. The second is a framework for novel model validation processes. Implications: These frameworks emphasize development of models through a deliberate, form-follows-function methodology, aimed at ensuring training quality through novel models. Following a blueprint of how to create, test, and improve models can save innovators time and energy, which in turn can yield greater and more plentiful innovation at lower time and financial cost. This guideline allows for more standardized approaches to model creation, thus improving future scholarship on novel models.

Identifiers

PMID38774824
PMCPMC11102942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.