ArticleBeilstein journal of nanotechnology2024
On the additive artificial intelligence-based discovery of nanoparticle neurodegenerative disease drug delivery systems.
Article in Beilstein journal of nanotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacological modulation of cGAS-STING-NLRP3 signaling by nano-immunomodulators in Alzheimer and Parkinson disease.Inflammopharmacology · 2026Review
- Smart Drug-Delivery Approaches for Enhanced Management of Comorbid Conditions in Alzheimer's Disease.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanoinformatics: spanning scales, systems and solutions.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2026Article
- Computational Phenotypic Drug Discovery for Anticancer Chemotherapy: PTML Modeling of Multi-Cell Inhibitors of Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Integrating artificial intelligence with nanodiagnostics for early detection and precision management of neurodegenerative diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Perturbation-Theory Machine Learning for Multi-Target Drug Discovery in Modern Anticancer Research.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- The blood-brain barriers: novel nanocarriers for central nervous system diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in neurodegenerative diseases research: a bibliometric analysis since 2000.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for brain disease: advances in diagnosis, drug discovery, and closed-loop therapeutics.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- NANO.PTML model for read-across prediction of nanosystems in neurosciences. computational model and experimental case of study.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- Nanoengineered phytochemicals overcome blood-brain barrier constraints in neurodegenerative disorders.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurodegenerative diseases are characterized by slowly progressing neuronal cell death. Conventional drug treatment strategies often fail because of poor solubility, low bioavailability, and the inability of the drugs to effectively cross the blood-brain barrier. Therefore, the development of new neurodegenerative disease drugs (NDDs) requires immediate attention. Nanoparticle (NP) systems are of increasing interest for transporting NDDs to the central nervous system. However, discovering effective nanoparticle neuronal disease drug delivery systems (N2D3Ss) is challenging because of the vast number of combinations of NP and NDD compounds, as well as the various assays involved. Artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) algorithms have the potential to accelerate this process by predicting the most promising NDD and NP candidates for assaying. Nevertheless, the relatively limited amount of reported data on N2D3S activity compared to assayed NDDs makes AI/ML analysis challenging. In this work, the IFPTML technique, which combines information fusion (IF), perturbation theory (PT), and machine learning (ML), was employed to address this challenge. Initially, we conducted the fusion into a unified dataset comprising 4403 NDD assays from ChEMBL and 260 NP cytotoxicity assays from journal articles. Through a resampling process, three new working datasets were generated, each containing 500,000 cases. We utilized linear discriminant analysis (LDA) along with artificial neural network (ANN) algorithms, such as multilayer perceptron (MLP) and deep learning networks (DLN), to construct linear and non-linear IFPTML models. The IFPTML-LDA models exhibited sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) values in the range of 70% to 73% (>375,000 training cases) and 70% to 80% (>125,000 validation cases), respectively. In contrast, the IFPTML-MLP and IFPTML-DLN achieved Sn and Sp values in the range of 85% to 86% for both training and validation series. Additionally, IFPTML-ANN models showed an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of approximately 0.93 to 0.95. These results indicate that the IFPTML models could serve as valuable tools in the design of drug delivery systems for neurosciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.