Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774537›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2024

Cancer cachexia: A scoping review on non-pharmacological interventions.

Elisabetta Bertocchi, Francesco Frigo, Loredana Buonaccorso, Francesco Venturelli, Maria Chiara Bassi, Silvia Tanzi

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Physical Activity, Exerkines, and Their Role in Cancer Cachexia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elisabetta BertocchiPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Francesco FrigoGastroenterology Unit, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; University of Turin, Torino, Italy.
Loredana BuonaccorsoPsycho-Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Francesco VenturelliEpidemiology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Maria Chiara BassiMedical Library, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Silvia TanziPalliative Care Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Cancer cachexia occurs in 30%-80% of patients, increasing morbidity and mortality and impacting the health-related quality of life also for caregivers. Pharmacological interventions have been studied but have shown inconsistent effects on patients' lives in terms of relative outcomes and poor adherence to pharmacological treatment. We provide an overview of the evidence on non-pharmacological interventions for cancer cachexia. Methods: We conducted a scoping review based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR). On September 21, 2022, plus an update on January 10, 2024, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, PsycINFO, and Scopus for 2012-2024. We excluded pharmacological interventions defined as "any substance, inorganic or organic, natural or synthetic, that can produce functional modifications, through a chemical, physicochemical or physical action." Results: The search retrieved 9308 articles, of which 17 were eligible. Non-pharmacological interventions included nutritional counseling, complementary therapies (acupuncture), rehabilitation, and psychoeducational/psychosocial support. The data showed small and heterogeneous samples and different disease localization and stages. Thirty-nine percent were multimodal interventions and aimed at patients, not families. The common primary outcomes were body weight and composition, biomarkers, quality of life, psychological suffering, and muscular strength. Only three studies focus on the patient-caregiver dyad. Conclusions: Interventions on cancer cachexia should be multimodal and multiprofessional, proposed early, and aimed at quality of life outcomes. The caregiver's involvement is essential. Nurses can play an active role in managing cancer cachexia. More well-designed studies are needed to understand the efficacy and contents of non-pharmacological interventions. Systematic review registration: The review protocol has been registered in the OSF registry (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/H4A29).

Indexed as

CachexiaNeoplasmPalliative carePsychosocial interventionQuality of lifeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38774537
PMCPMC11107192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.