Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774515›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

Homorepeat variability within the human population.

Pablo Mier, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro, Enrique Morett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pablo MierInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3663-2352
Miguel A Andrade-NavarroInstitute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Hanns-Dieter-Hüsch-Weg 15, 55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-1711
Enrique MorettDepartamento de Ingeniería Celular y Biocatálisis, Instituto de Biotecnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Av. Universidad 2001, Cuernavaca, Morelos 62210, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variation within populations plays a crucial role in driving evolution. Unlike the average protein sequence, the evolution of homorepeats can be influenced by DNA replication slippage, when DNA polymerases either add or skip repeats of nucleotides. While there are some diseases known to be caused by abnormal changes in the length of amino acid homorepeats, naturally occurring variations in homorepeat length remain relatively unexplored. In our study, we examined the variation in amino acid homorepeat length of human individuals by analyzing 125 748 exomes, as well as 15 708 whole genomes. Our analyses revealed significant variability in homorepeat length across the human population, indicating that these motifs are prone to mutations at higher rates than non repeat sequences. We focused our study on glutamine homorepeats, also known as polyQ sequences, and found that shorter polyQ sequences tend to exhibit greater length variation, while longer ones primarily undergo deletions. Notably, polyQ sequencesthat are more conserved across primates tend to show less variation within the human population, indicating stronger selective pressure to maintain their length. Overall, our results demonstrate that there is large natural variation in the length of homorepeats within the human population, with no apparent impact on observable traits.

Identifiers

PMID38774515
PMCPMC11106027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.