Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774479›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2024

Cleaning and Harmonizing Medical Image Data for Reliable AI: Lessons Learned from Longitudinal Oral Cancer Natural History Study Data.

Zhiyun Xue, Tochi Oguguo, Kelly J Yu, Tseng-Cheng Chen, Chun-Hung Hua, Chung Jan Kang, Chih-Yen Chien, Ming-Hsui Tsai, Cheng-Ping Wang, Anil K Chaturvedi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Weakly Supervised Learning of Oral Cavity Images for Separating Precancer from Cancer.IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems : COINS. IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems · 2026
    Article
  2. Oral Cancer Detection By Using Tabular Data Synthesis and Classification.Proceedings ... ICDM workshops. IEEE International Conference on Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  3. Detecting Oral Cancer Using Tabular Deep Learning.IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems : COINS. IEEE International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zhiyun XueNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Tochi OguguoNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Kelly J YuNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Tseng-Cheng ChenNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chun-Hung HuaChina Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chung Jan KangChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan.
Chih-Yen ChienChang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Ming-Hsui TsaiChina Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Cheng-Ping WangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Anil K ChaturvediNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.
Sameer AntaniNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA.

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA LM010018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For deep learning-based machine learning, not only are large and sufficiently diverse data crucial but their good qualities are equally important. However, in real-world applications, it is very common that raw source data may contain incorrect, noisy, inconsistent, improperly formatted and sometimes missing elements, particularly, when the datasets are large and sourced from many sites. In this paper, we present our work towards preparing and making image data ready for the development of AI-driven approaches for studying various aspects of the natural history of oral cancer. Specifically, we focus on two aspects: 1) cleaning the image data; and 2) extracting the annotation information. Data cleaning includes removing duplicates, identifying missing data, correcting errors, standardizing data sets, and removing personal sensitive information, toward combining data sourced from different study sites. These steps are often collectively referred to as data harmonization. Annotation information extraction includes identifying crucial or valuable texts that are manually entered by clinical providers related to the image paths/names and standardizing of the texts of labels. Both are important for the successful deep learning algorithm development and data analyses. Specifically, we provide details on the data under consideration, describe the challenges and issues we observed that motivated our work, present specific approaches and methods that we used to clean and standardize the image data and extract labelling information. Further, we discuss the ways to increase efficiency of the process and the lessons learned. Research ideas on automating the process with ML-driven techniques are also presented and discussed. Our intent in reporting and discussing such work in detail is to help provide insights in automating or, minimally, increasing the efficiency of these critical yet often under-reported processes.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Data CleaningImage Data HarmonizationImage Label ExtractionOral Cancer Screening

Identifiers

PMID38774479
PMCPMC11107840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.