Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774429›Full record

ArticleComputational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Altered Perception of Environmental Volatility During Social Learning in Emerging Psychosis.

Daniel J Hauke, Michelle Wobmann, Christina Andreou, Amatya J Mackintosh, Renate de Bock, Povilas Karvelis, Rick A Adams, Philipp Sterzer, Stefan Borgwardt, Volker Roth and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of affective states in computational psychiatry.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Daniel J HaukeCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1772-9239
Michelle WobmannDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Christina AndreouDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-9043
Amatya J MackintoshDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4535-8829
Renate de BockDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-2086
Povilas KarvelisKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7469-5624
Rick A AdamsCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7661-8881
Philipp SterzerDepartment of Psychiatry (UPK), University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-2317
Stefan BorgwardtDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Translational Psychiatry, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5792-3987
Volker RothDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0991-0273
Andreea O DiaconescuKrembil Centre for Neuroinformatics, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3633-9757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paranoid delusions or unfounded beliefs that others intend to deliberately cause harm are a frequent and burdensome symptom in early psychosis, but their emergence and consolidation still remains opaque. Recent theories suggest that overly precise prediction errors lead to an unstable model of the world providing a breeding ground for delusions. Here, we employ a Bayesian approach to test for such an unstable model of the world and investigate the computational mechanisms underlying emerging paranoia. We modelled behaviour of 18 first-episode psychosis patients (FEP), 19 individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHR-P), and 19 healthy controls (HC) during an advice-taking task designed to probe learning about others' changing intentions. We formulated competing hypotheses comparing the standard Hierarchical Gaussian Filter (HGF), a Bayesian belief updating scheme, with a mean-reverting HGF to model an altered perception of volatility. There was a significant group-by-volatility interaction on advice-taking suggesting that CHR-P and FEP displayed reduced adaptability to environmental volatility. Model comparison favored the standard HGF in HC, but the mean-reverting HGF in CHR-P and FEP in line with perceiving increased volatility, although model attributions in CHR-P were heterogeneous. We observed correlations between perceiving increased volatility and positive symptoms generally as well as with frequency of paranoid delusions specifically. Our results suggest that FEP are characterised by a different computational mechanism - perceiving the environment as increasingly volatile - in line with Bayesian accounts of psychosis. This approach may prove useful to investigate heterogeneity in CHR-P and identify vulnerability for transition to psychosis.

Indexed as

clinical high risk for psychosisfirst-episode psychosisHierarchical Gaussian Filterparanoid delusionsprediction errorsvolatility

Identifiers

PMID38774429
PMCPMC11104374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.