ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024
Artificial intelligence-based classification of echocardiographic views.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- AI-augmented cardiopulmonary point-of-care ultrasound: a narrative review for pulmonary and critical care clinicians.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Point-of-Care Ultrasound: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Improving structural heart disease screening: AI-ECG and novice AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Smarter FoCUS: AI-guided focused cardiac ultrasound enables novice detection of left ventricular dysfunction.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in breaking the learning curve for echocardiography: a secondary analysis of a multicentre trial.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Article
- Impact of Simulated Artifacts on the Classification Performance of Apical Views in Transthoracic Echocardiography Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A view-flexible deep learning framework for automated analysis of 2D echocardiography.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Article
- Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Evaluating Transthoracic Echocardiographic Imaging in Focus Cardiac Ultrasonography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Where Do We Stand?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Contemporary applications of artificial intelligence and machine learning in echocardiography.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2025Review
- Leveraging Comprehensive Echo Data to Power Artificial Intelligence Models for Handheld Cardiac Ultrasound.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2025Article
- Rheumatic heart valve disease: navigating the challenges of an overlooked autoimmune disorder.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- A deep learning model for classifying left ventricular enlargement for both transthoracic echocardiograms and handheld cardiac ultrasound.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Cardiovascular Imaging: Current Applications and New Horizons.Journal of cardiovascular echographyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Augmenting echocardiography with artificial intelligence would allow for automated assessment of routine parameters and identification of disease patterns not easily recognized otherwise. View classification is an essential first step before deep learning can be applied to the echocardiogram. Methods and results: We trained two- and three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (CNNs) using transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) studies obtained from 909 patients to classify nine view categories (10 269 videos). Transthoracic echocardiographic studies from 229 patients were used in internal validation (2582 videos). Convolutional neural networks were tested on 100 patients with comprehensive TTE studies (where the two examples chosen by CNNs as most likely to represent a view were evaluated) and 408 patients with five view categories obtained via point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The overall accuracy of the two-dimensional CNN was 96.8%, and the averaged area under the curve (AUC) was 0.997 on the comprehensive TTE testing set; these numbers were 98.4% and 0.998, respectively, on the POCUS set. For the three-dimensional CNN, the accuracy and AUC were 96.3% and 0.998 for full TTE studies and 95.0% and 0.996 on POCUS videos, respectively. The positive predictive value, which defined correctly identified predicted views, was higher with two-dimensional rather than three-dimensional networks, exceeding 93% in apical, short-axis aortic valve, and parasternal long-axis left ventricle views. Conclusion: An automated view classifier utilizing CNNs was able to classify cardiac views obtained using TTE and POCUS with high accuracy. The view classifier will facilitate the application of deep learning to echocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.