Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774368›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Photoplethysmography and intracardiac pressures: early insights from a pilot study.

Niels T B Scholte, Annemiek E van Ravensberg, Roos Edgar, Antoon J M van den Enden, Nicolas M D A van Mieghem, Jasper J Brugts, Judith L Bonnes, Nico Bruining, Robert M A van der Boon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Niels T B ScholteDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Annemiek E van RavensbergDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Roos EdgarDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Antoon J M van den EndenDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2449-8504
Nicolas M D A van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jasper J BrugtsDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Judith L BonnesDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4763-7805
Nico BruiningDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0272-5617
Robert M A van der BoonDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Institute, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6340-2590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Invasive haemodynamic monitoring of heart failure (HF) is used to detect deterioration in an early phase thereby preventing hospitalizations. However, this invasive approach is costly and presently lacks widespread accessibility. Hence, there is a pressing need to identify an alternative non-invasive method that is reliable and more readily available. In this pilot study, we investigated the relation between wrist-derived photoplethysmography (PPG) signals and the invasively measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). Methods and results: Fourteen patients with aortic valve stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement with concomitant right heart catheterization and PPG measurements were included. Six unique features of the PPG signals [heart rate, heart rate variability, systolic amplitude (SA), diastolic amplitude, crest time (CT), and large artery stiffness index (LASI)] were extracted. These features were used to estimate the continuous PCWP values and the categorized PCWP (low < 12 mmHg vs. high ≥ 12 mmHg). All PPG features resulted in regression models that showed low correlations with the invasively measured PCWP. Classification models resulted in higher performances: the model based on the SA and the model based on the LASI both resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.86 and the model based on the CT resulted in an AUC of 0.72. Conclusion: These results demonstrate the capability to non-invasively classify patients into clinically meaningful categories of PCWP using PPG signals from a wrist-worn wearable device. To enhance and fully explore its potential, the relationship between PPG and PCWP should be further investigated in a larger cohort of HF patients.

Indexed as

Heart failureIntracardiac PressuresPhotoplethysmographyTelemedicineWearables

Identifiers

PMID38774368
PMCPMC11104463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.