Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774366›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Predicting heart failure outcomes by integrating breath-by-breath measurements from cardiopulmonary exercise testing and clinical data through a deep learning survival neural network.

Heather J Ross, Mohammad Peikari, Julie K K Vishram-Nielsen, Chun-Po S Fan, Jason Hearn, Mike Walker, Edgar Crowdy, Ana Carolina Alba, Cedric Manlhiot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Heather J RossThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4384-3027
Mohammad PeikariThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Julie K K Vishram-NielsenThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Chun-Po S FanThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Jason HearnThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Mike WalkerThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Edgar CrowdyThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Ana Carolina AlbaThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Cedric ManlhiotThe Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9419-7681

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Mathematical models previously developed to predict outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) generally have limited performance and have yet to integrate complex data derived from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), including breath-by-breath data. We aimed to develop and validate a time-to-event prediction model using a deep learning framework using the DeepSurv algorithm to predict outcomes of HF. Methods and results: Inception cohort of 2490 adult patients with high-risk cardiac conditions or HF underwent CPET with breath-by-breath measurements. Potential predictive features included known clinical indicators, standard summary statistics from CPETs, and mathematical features extracted from the breath-by-breath time series of 13 measurements. The primary outcome was a composite of death, heart transplant, or mechanical circulatory support treated as a time-to-event outcomes. Predictive features ranked as most important included many of the features engineered from the breath-by-breath data in addition to traditional clinical risk factors. The prediction model showed excellent performance in predicting the composite outcome with an area under the curve of 0.93 in the training and 0.87 in the validation data sets. Both the predicted vs. actual freedom from the composite outcome and the calibration of the prediction model were excellent. Model performance remained stable in multiple subgroups of patients. Conclusion: Using a combined deep learning and survival algorithm, integrating breath-by-breath data from CPETs resulted in improved predictive accuracy for long-term (up to 10 years) outcomes in HF. DeepSurv opens the door for future prediction models that are both highly performing and can more fully use the large and complex quantity of data generated during the care of patients with HF.

Indexed as

Exercise testingHeart failureMachine learningPrognosisSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID38774366
PMCPMC11104469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.