Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774287›Full record

ArticleContinuity in education2022

Support for Community School Personnel Working with Pediatric Cancer Patients: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

Sarah Klein, Nicole Byford, Susan Ellison, Niki Jurbergs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Continuity in education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah KleinSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-9211
Nicole ByfordSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-6530
Susan EllisonSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/000-0001-7135-4955
Niki JurbergsSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0429-198X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved therapies and increased survival rates are sending more pediatric cancer patients and survivors back to their classrooms; however, most community school personnel lack training or experience in working with these students. The aim of this quality improvement project was twofold: (a) to evaluate community school personnel's perceptions of their preparedness to work with patients and childhood cancer survivors who have reentered the classroom; and (b) to standardize school reentry supports to improve community school personnel preparedness. Twenty community school personnel, prekindergarten through 12-grade teachers, guidance counselors, and administrators, who had previously worked with a pediatric cancer patient were surveyed regarding their experiences with the patient's school reentry. Responses were coded and analyzed, and a thematic map was created. School personnel reported concerns related to student functioning, such as academic readiness, cognitive impacts of treatment, social-emotional adjustment, physical ability to participate in school, and medical fragility. They also reported concerns related to their own ability to accommodate the student's needs. These results were used to design educational guides for community personnel consisting of information and resources to support them in managing the unique academic, social-emotional, physical, and medical needs of pediatric cancer patients and survivors in the classroom.

Indexed as

educationpediatric oncologypsychosocial supportschool personnelschool reentry

Identifiers

PMID38774287
PMCPMC11104404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.