ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Clinical Characteristics and Biomarkers in Culture-Positive and Culture-Negative Sepsis Patients.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sepsis in Internal Medicine: blood culture-based subtypes, hospital outcomes, and predictive biomarkers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSepsis is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and culture-negative sepsis, despite its prevalence, is largely understudied. The current study intends to examine clinical characteristics and biomarkers in culture-positive and culture-negative sepsis, focusing on 30-day mortality and duration of hospital stay in both groups. Materials and methods: A prospective observational comparative cohort study was done on 150 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and wards of Jaipur Golden Hospital. Patients with documented fungal, viral, or parasitic infections, as well as those who had undergone surgery or experienced trauma, were excluded. Results: The mean age of the patients was 51.31±18.94 years. Of 150 patients, 95 (63.3%) were culture-negative, whereas 55 (36.7%) were culture-positive, with more men in the former and more women in the latter. Patients with negative cultures had fewer comorbidities. The levels of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and serum lactate were within the prescribed limit for both culture-negative and positive patients. A higher proportion (87.3%) of the organisms isolated from culture-positive individuals were gram-negative, with
conclusionIt can be concluded that CRP and PCT can be used as clinically reliable sepsis biomarkers in both culture-positive and culture-negative patients. The study found that culture-negative sepsis is more prevalent and that there are substantial differences between culture-negative and culture-positive sepsis, with the former group having fewer comorbidities, less severe illness, a shorter duration of hospital stays, lower death rates, and better outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.