Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774122›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024

Automated dispensing cabinets and their impact on the rate of omitted and delayed doses: A systematic review.

Emma Jeffrey, Melanie Dalby, Áine Walsh, Kit Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Tackling medication errors: how a systems approach improves patient safety.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The use of automated dispensing cabinets in hospitals.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emma JeffreyPharmacy Department, Level 1 Cheyne Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SE59RS London, United Kingdom.
Melanie DalbyPharmacy Department, Level 1 Cheyne Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SE59RS London, United Kingdom.
Áine WalshPharmacy Department, Level 1 Cheyne Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SE59RS London, United Kingdom.
Kit LaiPharmacy Department, Level 1 Cheyne Wing, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SE59RS London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Use of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) is increasing in hospital settings. ADCs bring various potential benefits, among which are improvements to patient safety and reduction of medication errors. A core function of ADCs is to prevent medication stock outs by triggering an order when stock is reaching low levels. A quantifiable patient safety measure is the occurrence of omitted or delayed doses, which can range in severity from being negligible, to potentially fatal. The purpose of this review is to identify and synthesise the existing evidence regarding the impact of ADCs situated in secondary and tertiary care inpatient settings, on the rate of omitted and delayed doses as a specific subsection of medication errors. In April 2024 searches were conducted in Embase, PubMed and CINAHL, with additional articles discovered through citation searching and from colleagues. A total of 375 articles were returned from the search. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria. The most common reason for exclusion was due to lack of relevance. The included papers were focused on centres which had implemented six or fewer ADCs. The studies mostly presented findings which suggest ADCs have a positive impact on the rate of omitted or delayed doses, although crucially only two papers correlated missed doses due to unavailability of medications The studies highlighted other factors which should be considered prior to the implementation of ADCs. Factors included staffing requirement, type of stock held in the cabinets, and interoperability with other systems. Studies only reported omitted or missed doses, none reported results on delayed doses. It is widely accepted that ADCs can prevent medication unavailability but there is a paucity of evidence linking the improved availability of medications through the utilisation of ADCs with the perceived impact on missed or delayed doses. Further multi-centre studies are needed to determine this causality.

Indexed as

Automated dispensing cabinetElectronic prescribing and medicines administrationOmitted doses

Identifiers

PMID38774122
PMCPMC11107352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.