Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774117›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2024

Improving shared decision-making around antimicrobial-prescribing during the end-of-life period: a qualitative study of Veterans, their support caregivers and their providers.

Cassie Cunningham Goedken, Erin Balkenende, Daniel Livorsi, Karleen Giannitrapani, Matthew McCaa, Gosia Clore, Michihiko Goto, Alexandre R Marra, Eli N Perencevich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Cassie Cunningham GoedkenCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0990-1799
Erin BalkenendeCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Daniel LivorsiCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8523-214X
Karleen GiannitrapaniCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Matthew McCaaCenter for Innovation to Implementation (Ci2i), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Menlo Park, CA, USA.
Gosia CloreCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Michihiko GotoCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6612-5613
Alexandre R MarraCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Eli N PerencevichCenter for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Antimicrobials are frequently used for palliation during end-of-life care, but adverse effects, such as antimicrobial resistance, are a concern. Shared decision-making is beneficial in end-of-life care conversations to help align antimicrobial-prescribing with patient preferences. However, there is limited data regarding optimal incorporation of antimicrobial-prescribing discussions into shared decision-making conversations. We explored healthcare provider, patient, and support caregiver (eg, family member/friend) perceptions of barriers and facilitators to discussing antimicrobial-prescribing during the end-of-life period. Design: Qualitative study. Participants: Healthcare providers; palliative care/hospice care patients/caregivers. Methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews on shared attitudes/beliefs about antimicrobial-prescribing during end-of-life patient care at one acute-care and one long-term-care facility. Interviews were analyzed for thematic content. Results: Fifteen providers and 13 patients/caregivers completed interviews. Providers recognized the potential benefit of leveraging shared decision-making to guide antimicrobial-prescribing decisions. Barriers included limited face-to-face time with the patient and uncertainty of end-of-life prognosis. Patients/caregivers cited trust, comprehension, and feeling heard as important characteristics which act as facilitators in fostering effective shared decision-making around antimicrobial use. Communication in which providers ensure patients are involved in shared decision-making discussions could be increased to ensure patients and their providers develop a mutually agreeable care plan. Conclusions: Shared decision-making is a practice that can guide antimicrobial-prescribing decisions during end-of-life care, thus potentially minimizing antimicrobial-related adverse effects. Our findings highlight opportunities for increased shared decision-making around antimicrobial use during end-of-life care. Interventions designed to address the identified barriers to shared decision-making have the potential to improve antimicrobial-prescribing practices at end-of-life.

Identifiers

PMID38774117
PMCPMC11106728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.