Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774114›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2024

Assessment of fall-back MRLs for revoked CXLs previously implemented in the EU legislation and review of the JMPR evaluation of the toxicological data related to pyrasulfotole, pyraziflumid, spiropidion and tetraniliprole.

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Modification of the existing maximum residue level for chlormequat in oat.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Setting of import tolerances for azoxystrobin in melons and watermelons.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

EFSA (European Food Safety Authority)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In accordance with Article 43 of Regulation (EC) 396/2005, EFSA received a request from the European Commission to propose fall-back maximum residue levels (MRLs) for recently revoked Codex MRLs that have been previously implemented in the EU legislation. Overall, MRLs for 12 a.s. are concerned, i.e. chlormequat, diazinon, bifenthrin, fludioxonil, indoxacarb, difenoconazole, famoxadone, azoxystrobin, mandipropamid, emamectin benzoate, flutriafol and afidopyropen. In addition, EFSA was requested to evaluate the toxicological data assessed by JMPR related to pyrasulfotole, pyraziflumid, spiropidion and tetraniliprole. These are active substances have not been assessed previously at EU level. The assessment should allow to take a decision, if the CXLs adopted for these four a.s. can be implemented in the EU MRL legislation.

Indexed as

consumer risk assessmentpyrasulfotolepyrazyflumidrevoked Codex MRLsspiropidiontetraniliproletoxicological evaluation

Identifiers

PMID38774114
PMCPMC11106678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.