Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Communities organizing to promote equity: engaging local communities in public health responses to health inequities exacerbated by COVID-19-protocol paper.

Christina M Pacheco, Kristina M Bridges, Edward F Ellerbeck, Elizabeth Ablah, K Allen Greiner, Yvonnes Chen, Vicki Collie-Akers, Mariana Ramírez, Joseph W LeMaster, Kevin Sykes and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using an asset mapping approach to evaluate the reach of community-level health equity interventions.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Christina M PachecoDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Kristina M BridgesDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Edward F EllerbeckDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Elizabeth AblahDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS, United States.
K Allen GreinerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Yvonnes ChenSchool of Journalism and Mass Communications, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Vicki Collie-AkersDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Mariana RamírezDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Joseph W LeMasterDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Kevin SykesDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Daniel J ParenteDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Erin CorriveauDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Antonio Miras NeiraDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Angela ScottDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Kara E KnappDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Jennifer WoodwardDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
Sarah Finocchario-KesslerDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States.
COPE Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted rural and under-resourced urban communities in Kansas. The state's response to COVID-19 has relied on a highly decentralized and underfunded public health system, with 100 local health departments in the state, few of which had prior experience engaging local community coalitions in a coordinated response to a public health crisis. Methods: To improve the capacity for local community-driven responses to COVID-19 and other public health needs, the University of Kansas Medical Center, in partnership with the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, will launch Communities Organizing to Promote Equity (COPE) in 20 counties across Kansas. COPE will establish Local Health Equity Action Teams (LHEATs), coalitions comprised of community members and service providers, who work with COPE-hired community health workers (CHWs) recruited to represent the diversity of the communities they serve. CHWs in each county are tasked with addressing unmet social needs of residents and supporting their county's LHEAT. LHEATs are charged with implementing strategies to improve social determinants of health in their county. Monthly, LHEATs and CHWs from all 20 counties will come together as part of a learning collaborative to share strategies, foster innovation, and engage in peer problem-solving. These efforts will be supported by a multilevel communications strategy that will increase awareness of COPE activities and resources at the local level and successes across the state. Our mixed methods evaluation design will assess the processes and impact of COPE activities as well as barriers and facilitators to implementation using aspects of both the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) models. Discussion: This protocol is designed to expand community capacity to strategically partner with local public health and social service partners to prioritize and implement health equity efforts. COPE intentionally engages historically resilient communities and those living in underserved rural areas to inform pragmatic strategies to improve health equity.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health EquityPublic HealthCommunity Health WorkersHealth Status DisparitiesHumansKansasSARS-CoV-2community coalitionscommunity health workersCOVID-19heath equitypublic healthruralsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID38774043
PMCPMC11107291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.