Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38774012›Full record

ArticleJACC. CardioOncology2024

A Biomarker-Based Diagnostic Model for Cardiac Dysfunction in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

Jan M Leerink, Elizabeth A M Feijen, Esmee C de Baat, Remy Merkx, Helena J H van der Pal, Wim J E Tissing, Marloes Louwerens, Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink, A Birgitta Versluys, Elvira C van Dalen and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. CardioOncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Management of late toxicities and specific follow-up needs of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: recommendations from scientific societies in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Jan M LeerinkAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elizabeth A M FeijenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Esmee C de BaatPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Remy MerkxRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Helena J H van der PalPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wim J E TissingPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Marloes LouwerensDepartment of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Marry M van den Heuvel-EibrinkPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
A Birgitta VersluysPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Elvira C van DalenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Margriet van der Heiden-van der LooPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Dorine BrestersPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cécile M RonckersPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Andrica C H de VriesPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Sebastian NeggersPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Livia KapustaRadboud University Medical Center, Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline LoonenDepartment of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Yigal M PintoAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Leontien C M KremerPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Annelies M C Mavinkurve-GroothuisPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Wouter E M KokAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood cancer survivors at risk for heart failure undergo lifelong echocardiographic surveillance. Previous studies reported the limited diagnostic accuracy of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in detecting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, potential enhanced diagnostic accuracy through the combination of biomarkers and clinical characteristics has been suggested. Objectives: The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a diagnostic model that combines cardiac biomarkers with clinical characteristics for effectively ruling in or ruling out LV dysfunction in childhood cancer survivors. Methods: A multicenter cross-sectional study included 1,334 survivors (median age 34.2 years) and 278 siblings (median age 36.8 years). Logistic regression models were developed and validated through bootstrapping, combining biomarkers with clinical characteristics. Results: Abnormal NT-proBNP levels were observed in 22.1% of survivors compared with 5.4% of siblings, whereas hs-cTnT levels exceeding 10 ng/L were uncommon in both survivors (5.9%) and siblings (5.0%). The diagnostic models demonstrated improvement upon the addition of NT-proBNP and hs-cTnT to clinical characteristics, resulting in an increased C statistic from 0.69 to 0.73 for LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% and a more accurate prediction of more severe LV dysfunction, with the C statistic increasing from 0.80 to 0.86 for LVEF <45%. For LVEF <50% (prevalence 10.9%), 16.9% of survivors could be effectively ruled out with high sensitivity (95.4%; 95% CI: 90.4%-99.3%) and negative predictive value (97.5%; 95% CI: 94.6%-99.7%). Similarly, for LVEF <45% (prevalence 3.4%), 53.0% of survivors could be ruled out with moderate to high sensitivity (91.1%; 95% CI: 79.2%-100%) and high negative predictive value (99.4%; 95% CI: 98.7%-100%). Conclusions: The biomarker-based diagnostic model proves effective in ruling out LV dysfunction, offering the potential to minimize unnecessary surveillance echocardiography in childhood cancer survivors. External validation is essential to confirm these findings. (Early Detection of Cardiac Dysfunction in Childhood Cancer Survivors; A DCOG LATER Study; https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/23641).

Indexed as

biomarkerscardio-oncologychildhood cancer survivorsdiagnostic accuracy

Identifiers

PMID38774012
PMCPMC11103045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.