Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773690›Full record

ArticleThe plant genome2024

Development and evaluation of Fusarium wilt-resistant and high-yielding chickpea advanced breeding line, KCD 11.

C Laxuman, Yogesh Dashrath Naik, B K Desai, Mallikarjun Kenganal, Bharat Patil, B S Reddy, D H Patil, Sidramappa Chakurte, P H Kuchanur, Shiva Kumar K and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant genome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

C LaxumanZonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Kalaburagi, University of Agricultural Sciences-Raichur (UAS-R), Raichur, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0893-2043
Yogesh Dashrath NaikDepartment of Agricultural Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University (RPCAU), Samastipur, Bihar, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4336-9364
B K DesaiDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Mallikarjun KenganalZonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Kalaburagi, University of Agricultural Sciences-Raichur (UAS-R), Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Bharat PatilDepartment of Agronomy, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6419-4405
B S ReddyZonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Kalaburagi, University of Agricultural Sciences-Raichur (UAS-R), Raichur, Karnataka, India.
D H PatilZonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Kalaburagi, University of Agricultural Sciences-Raichur (UAS-R), Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Sidramappa ChakurteDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Agricultural Research Station, UAS-R, Bidar, Karnataka, India.
P H KuchanurDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Collage of Agriculture, UAS-R, Bheemarayanagudi, Karnataka, India.
Shiva Kumar KDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Main Agricultural Research Station (MARS), UAS-R, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Ashok Kumar GaddiDepartment of Soil Science, Agricultural Research Station, Sirguppa, UAS-R, Sirguppa, Karnataka, India.
L N YogeshDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Agricultural Research Station, UAS-R, Hagari, Karnataka, India.
Jayaprakash NidagundiDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Main Agricultural Research Station (MARS), UAS-R, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
B M DodamaniZonal Agricultural Research Station (ZARS), Kalaburagi, University of Agricultural Sciences-Raichur (UAS-R), Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Gururaj SunkadDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Agricultural Sciences, Raichur, Karnataka, India.
Mahendar ThudiCentre for Crop Health and School of Agriculture and Environmental Science, University of Southern Queensland (UniSQ), Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2851-6837
Rajeev K VarshneyCenter of Excellence in Genomics & Systems Biology, International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru, Telangana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4562-9131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium wilt (FW) is the most severe soil-borne disease of chickpea that causes yield losses up to 100%. To improve FW resistance in JG 11, a high-yielding variety that became susceptible to FW, we used WR 315 as the donor parent and followed the pedigree breeding method. Based on disease resistance and yield performance, four lines were evaluated in station trials during 2017-2018 and 2018-2019 at Kalaburagi, India. Further, two lines, namely, Kalaburagi chickpea desi 5 (KCD 5) and KCD 11, which possesses the resistance allele for a specific single-nucleotide polymorphism marker linked with FW resistance, were evaluated across six different locations (Bidar, Kalaburagi, Raichur, Siruguppa, Bhimarayanagudi and Hagari) over a span of 3 years (2020-2021, 2021-2022 and 2022-2023). KCD 11 exhibited notable performance, showcasing yield advantages of 8.67%, 11.26% and 23.88% over JG 11, and the regional checks Super Annigeri 1 (SA 1) and Annigeri 1, respectively, with enhanced FW resistance in wilt sick plot. Further, KCD 11 outperformed JG 11, SA 1 and Annigeri 1 in multi-location trials conducted across three seasons in the North Eastern Transition Zone, North Eastern Dry Zone, and North Dry Zones of Karnataka. KCD 11 was also tested in trials conducted by All India Coordinated Research Project on chickpea and was also nominated for state varietal trials for its release as a FW-resistant and high-yielding variety. The selected line is anticipated to cater the needs of chickpea growers with the dual advantage of yield increment and disease resistance.

Indexed as

CicerDisease ResistanceFusariumPlant BreedingPlant DiseasesPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID38773690
PMCPMC12807272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.