Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773648›Full record

ReviewResearch involvement and engagement2024

MyHospitalVoice - a digital tool co-created with children and adolescents that captures patient-reported experience measures: a study protocol.

Jane Hybschmann, Jette Led Sørensen, Jakob Thestrup, Helle Pappot, Kirsten Arntz Boisen, Thomas Leth Frandsen, Line Klingen Gjærde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research involvement and engagement, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jane HybschmannMary Elizabeth's Hospital and Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark. jane.hybschmann-nielsen@regionh.dk.
Jette Led SørensenMary Elizabeth's Hospital and Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Jakob ThestrupMary Elizabeth's Hospital and Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Helle PappotDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Kirsten Arntz BoisenDepartment of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Center of Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Thomas Leth FrandsenMary Elizabeth's Hospital and Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.
Line Klingen GjærdeMary Elizabeth's Hospital and Juliane Marie Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, 2100, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and adolescents have the right to participate in decisions concerning their health and express their views, also regarding hospital experiences. Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) are valuable tools for systematically incorporating patient voices into healthcare systems. New developments have focused on PREMs for children and adolescents, though they are more commonly used in adults. A recent systematic review mapping their use for children and adolescents indicates a growing interest in this area. However, most PREMs are completed by proxy, in this case parents, so they do not necessarily reflect children's experiences or align with their rights. Innovation is required to support and engage children and adolescents in responding to these types of questionnaires.

methodsCollaborating with children and adolescents (4-17 years), the primary aim of this study is to develop and validate the tool MyHospitalVoice containing digital and developmentally appropriate PREMs. The secondary aim is to document and evaluate the approaches used to involve children and adolescents and to assess the impact of their involvement. Based on the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer framework, we will divide its development and validation into four phases. First, we will discuss PREM items with children and adolescents, who will select and prioritise what they perceive as most important. Second, we will create items targeting different age groups (4-7, 8-12, and 13-17 years) and design a responsive digital interface with child and youth friendly ways of responding to the questionnaires. Third, we will explore how children and adolescents perceive MyHospitalVoice using cognitive interviewing techniques and other age-appropriate methods. Last, we will pilot test MyHospitalVoice to explore patient experiences and response rates. In each phase, children and adolescents will play an active role. We will involve young adults as peer researchers in the project group to ensure that their perspectives are part of the decision-making process. DISCUSSION: This project will contribute to research on co-creating with children and adolescents and enhance our understanding of their patient experiences. A validated tool like MyHospitalVoice can help improve quality of care by translating the needs and preferences of children and adolescents into clinical practice.

Indexed as

Adolescent participationChild participationCo-creationHospital experiencePatient and public involvementPatient-reported experience measureQuality of healthcareResearch involvement

Identifiers

PMID38773648
PMCPMC11110337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.