Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773641›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Genome-wide identification of replication fork stalling/pausing sites and the interplay between RNA Pol II transcription and DNA replication progression.

Patricia Rojas, Jianming Wang, Giovanni Guglielmi, Martina Mustè Sadurnì, Lucas Pavlou, Geoffrey Ho Duen Leung, Vijay Rajagopal, Fabian Spill, Marco Saponaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Patricia Rojas *Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Jianming Wang *Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Giovanni GuglielmiSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Martina Mustè SadurnìInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Lucas PavlouInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Geoffrey Ho Duen LeungInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Vijay RajagopalDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Fabian SpillSchool of Mathematics, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
Marco SaponaroInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. m.saponaro@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9302-2553

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S016155/1Cancer Research UK C17422/A25154Royal Society RG170246UK Research and Innovation MR/T043571/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 202115/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA replication progression can be affected by the presence of physical barriers like the RNA polymerases, leading to replication stress and DNA damage. Nonetheless, we do not know how transcription influences overall DNA replication progression.

resultsTo characterize sites where DNA replication forks stall and pause, we establish a genome-wide approach to identify them. This approach uses multiple timepoints during S-phase to identify replication fork/stalling hotspots as replication progresses through the genome. These sites are typically associated with increased DNA damage, overlapped with fragile sites and with breakpoints of rearrangements identified in cancers but do not overlap with replication origins. Overlaying these sites with a genome-wide analysis of RNA polymerase II transcription, we find that replication fork stalling/pausing sites inside genes are directly related to transcription progression and activity. Indeed, we find that slowing down transcription elongation slows down directly replication progression through genes. This indicates that transcription and replication can coexist over the same regions. Importantly, rearrangements found in cancers overlapping transcription-replication collision sites are detected in non-transformed cells and increase following treatment with ATM and ATR inhibitors. At the same time, we find instances where transcription activity favors replication progression because it reduces histone density.

conclusionsAltogether, our findings highlight how transcription and replication overlap during S-phase, with both positive and negative consequences for replication fork progression and genome stability by the coexistence of these two processes.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationRNA Polymerase IITranscription, GeneticAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsDNA DamageGenome, HumanHumansReplication OriginS PhaseAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsRNA Polymerase IIDNA damageDNA replicationReplication fork pausing/stallingReplication fork speedReplication stressRNA Pol II transcriptionTranscription elongation

Identifiers

PMID38773641
PMCPMC11106976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.