ArticleGenome biology2024
Biologically informed NeuralODEs for genome-wide regulatory dynamics.
Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- How AI Can Advance Mathematical Biology: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2026Review
- Deciphering microbial community dynamics using cross-sectional data-informed NeuralODE.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Large-scale, interpretable gene regulatory network inference through biologically informed matrix factorization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Learning dynamical systems with biochemically informed neural ordinary differential equations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A novel approach to quantify out-of-distribution uncertainty in Neural and Universal Differential Equations.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- From time-course expression to gene regulation: direct linear ODE inference without finite-difference approximation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Inferring stochastic dynamics by biophysical Neural ODE using single-cell transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Physics-Informed Machine Learning in Biomedical Science and Engineering.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota-derived metabolites as immune modulators in aging and age-related chronic inflammatory diseases.Ageing research reviews · 2026Review
- Multimodal bioinformatic analyses of genome-scale expression beyond gene-centric differential expression.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Generative models of cell dynamics: from Neural ODEs to flow matching.Communications biology · 2026Review
- AI-Based Prediction of Gene Expression in Single-Cell and Multiscale Genomics and Transcriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- DANSE: a pipeline for dynamic modelling of time-series multi-omics data.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- LazyNet: Interpretable ODE Modeling of Sparse CRISPR Single-Cell Screens Reveals New Biological Insights.Biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Identification of models describing gene expression data leveraging machine learning methods.Interface focus · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of plant root development: the art and the science.The New phytologist · 2025Review
- The times they are AI-changing: AI-powered advances in the application of extracellular vesicles to liquid biopsy in breast cancer.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
- Update of
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGene regulatory network (GRN) models that are formulated as ordinary differential equations (ODEs) can accurately explain temporal gene expression patterns and promise to yield new insights into important cellular processes, disease progression, and intervention design. Learning such gene regulatory ODEs is challenging, since we want to predict the evolution of gene expression in a way that accurately encodes the underlying GRN governing the dynamics and the nonlinear functional relationships between genes. Most widely used ODE estimation methods either impose too many parametric restrictions or are not guided by meaningful biological insights, both of which impede either scalability, explainability, or both.
resultsWe developed PHOENIX, a modeling framework based on neural ordinary differential equations (NeuralODEs) and Hill-Langmuir kinetics, that overcomes limitations of other methods by flexibly incorporating prior domain knowledge and biological constraints to promote sparse, biologically interpretable representations of GRN ODEs. We tested the accuracy of PHOENIX in a series of in silico experiments, benchmarking it against several currently used tools. We demonstrated PHOENIX's flexibility by modeling regulation of oscillating expression profiles obtained from synchronized yeast cells. We also assessed the scalability of PHOENIX by modeling genome-scale GRNs for breast cancer samples ordered in pseudotime and for B cells treated with Rituximab.
conclusionsPHOENIX uses a combination of user-defined prior knowledge and functional forms from systems biology to encode biological "first principles" as soft constraints on the GRN allowing us to predict subsequent gene expression patterns in a biologically explainable manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.