ArticleCritical care (London, England)2024
Expiratory flow limitation during mechanical ventilation: real-time detection and physiological subtypes.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The clinical trade-off of intraluminal versus extraluminal bronchial blockers in children: a retrospective analysis of respiratory mechanics and airway trauma during lung isolation preparation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Comment on "Expiratory time constants in mechanically ventilated patients rethinking the old concept: a narrative review".Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
- Expiratory time constants in mechanically ventilated patients: rethinking the old concept-a narrative review.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTidal expiratory flow limitation (EFL
methodsMedical patients ≥ 15-year-old receiving mechanical ventilation underwent a PEEP reduction manoeuvre from 5 cmH
results339 patients initially enrolled and underwent a PEEP reduction. The prevalence of EFL
conclusionsThe Rex method shows an excellent agreement with the PEEP reduction manoeuvre and allows real-time detection of EFL
trial registrationClinical trial registered with www.thaiclinicaltrials.org (TCTR20190318003). The registration date was on 18 March 2019, and the first subject enrollment was performed on 26 March 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.