Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773608›Full record

Observational studyFluids and barriers of the CNS2024

Intracranial pressure following surgery of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm-a model for normal intracranial pressure in humans.

Nicolas Hernandez Norager, Alexander Lilja-Cyron, Casper Schwartz Riedel, Anders Vedel Holst, Sarah Hornshoej Pedersen, Marianne Juhler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03594136 (Challenging Reference Values for Intracranial Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03594136 nacompletednot on this map

Challenging Reference Values for Intracranial Pressure: A Prospective, Multicenter, Clinical Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorRigshospitalet, DenmarkRan2018 to 2023Enrolled6ConditionsIntracranial PressureArmsRaumedic Neurovent-P-tel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicolas Hernandez NoragerClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark. nicolas.norager@gmail.com.
Alexander Lilja-CyronClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.
Casper Schwartz RiedelClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.
Anders Vedel HolstClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.
Sarah Hornshoej PedersenClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.
Marianne JuhlerClinic of Neurosurgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Inge Lehmanns Vej 6, 2100, Copenhagen East, Denmark.

Funding

Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF17OC0024718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOptimizing the treatment of several neurosurgical and neurological disorders relies on knowledge of the intracranial pressure (ICP). However, exploration of normal ICP and intracranial pressure pulse wave amplitude (PWA) values in healthy individuals poses ethical challenges, and thus the current documentation remains scarce. This study explores ICP and PWA values for healthy adults without intracranial pathology expected to influence ICP.

methodsAdult patients (age > 18 years) undergoing surgery for an unruptured intracranial aneurysm without any other neurological co-morbidities were included. Patients had a telemetric ICP sensor inserted, and ICP was measured in four different positions: supine, lateral recumbent, standing upright, and 45-degree sitting, at day 1, 14, 30, and 90 following the surgery.

resultsICP in each position did not change with time after surgery. Median ICP was 6.7 mmHg and median PWA 2.1 mmHg in the supine position, while in the upright standing position median ICP was - 3.4 mmHg and median PWA was 1.9 mmHg. After standardization of the measurements from the transducer site to the external acoustic meatus, the median ICP

conclusionOur study provides insights into normal ICP dynamics in healthy adults following a uncomplicated surgery for an unruptured aneurysm. These results suggest a slightly wider normal reference range for invasive intracranial pressure than previously suggested, and present the first normal values for PWA in different positions. Further studies are, however, essential to enhance our understanding of normal ICP. Trial registration The study was preregistered at www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT03594136) (11 July 2018).

Indexed as

Intracranial AneurysmIntracranial PressureAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPostureProspective StudiesPulse Wave AnalysisIntracranial pressure (ICP)Normal ICP reference valueTelemetric ICP monitoringUnruptured intracranial aneurysm

Identifiers

PMID38773608
PMCPMC11110356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.