Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773568›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2024

Effectiveness of a home-based pulmonary rehabilitation maintenance programme: the Rehab2Life study protocol.

Liliana Silva, Tiago Maricoto, Ângela Mota, Lara Lemos, Mariana Santos, Hélder Cunha, Inês Azevedo, Joana Berger-Estilita, Patrício Costa, José Miguel Padilha

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05315505 (Effectiveness of a Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05315505 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of a Home-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program in COPD Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUnidade Local de Saúde de Matosinhos, EPERan2022 to 2024Enrolled160ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary RehabilitationArmsMaintenance programme, Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Liliana SilvaMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal. enf.lilianasilva@gmail.com.
Tiago MaricotoBeira Ria Family Heath Unit/ULS Aveiro, Ílhavo, Portugal.
Ângela MotaMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Lara LemosMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Mariana SantosMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Hélder CunhaMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Inês AzevedoMatosinhos Local Health Unit, Matosinhos, Portugal.
Joana Berger-EstilitaCINTESIS, Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Patrício CostaLife and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.
José Miguel PadilhaCINTESIS, Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the bedrock of non-pharmacological treatment for people with COPD. Nonetheless, it is well described in the literature that unless the patient changes his behaviour, the benefits of PR programmes will decline in six to twelve months after finishing the programme. Therefore, maintenance programmes can address the problem of PR programmes' effect loss over time.Community care units can provide multidisciplinary care in the current Portuguese primary health care context. These units have an interdisciplinary team that aims to develop competencies in COPD patients to self-manage the disease.This study aims to test the effectiveness of a 12-month home-based PR programme (Rehab2Life) compared to usual care through a single-blind randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups. The Rehab2Life programme includes two distinct phases. The first is an 8-week PR programme delivered to both groups, and the second is a PR maintenance programme delivered to the intervention group after the initial eight weeks. The control group receive the usual care and regular appointments. The primary outcome is functional capacity, and secondary outcomes are dyspnea, Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), number of exacerbations, symptoms burden, anxiety and depression symptoms, and physical activity.We expect to observe that the home-based PR programme brings clinically relevant benefits to the participants at the end of the first eight weeks and that, at 12 months after the maintenance phase of the programme, benefits are less dissipated than in the control group. We expect to identify the characteristics of the patients who benefit the most from home-based programmes.The trial was registered on 7 April 2022 at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05315505).

Indexed as

COPDFunctional capacityHome-based, self-managmentMaintenancePulmonary rehabilitationRehabilitation nursing

Identifiers

PMID38773568
PMCPMC11107066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.