Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38773547›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2024

Salivary and serum haptoglobin, adenosine deaminase, and immunoglobulin G in growing pigs.

Virpi Piirainen, Ana M Gutiérrez, Mari Heinonen, Emilia König, Anna Valros, Sami Junnikkala

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Virpi PiirainenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Leissantie 41, Saarentaus, FI-04920, Finland.
Ana M GutiérrezDepartment of Animal Medicine and Surgery, BioVetMed Research group, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, Murcia, 30100, Spain.
Mari HeinonenFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Leissantie 41, Saarentaus, FI-04920, Finland. mari.heinonen@helsinki.fi.
Emilia KönigFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Production Animal Medicine, University of Helsinki, Leissantie 41, Saarentaus, FI-04920, Finland.
Anna ValrosResearch Centre for Animal Welfare, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Helsinki, Koetilantie 7, Helsinki, FI-00790, Finland.
Sami JunnikkalaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Veterinary Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Agnes Sjöbergin katu 2, Helsinki, FI-00790, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentification of animals in need of medical treatment is important in porcine health management, where analytical samples applicable at farm level could be utilized. Several biomarkers are measurable in saliva, which is less stressful to collect than blood. Saliva sampling is easy to learn and repeatable, making it suitable for monitoring purposes. Previous research suggests that porcine health biomarkers are dependent on production stage and gender, and that combining biomarkers improves diagnostic sensitivity. However, proper monitoring of biomarkers during the complete production cycle has not been studied. We aimed to describe the dynamics of salivary and serum haptoglobin (Hp), adenosine deaminase (ADA), and immunoglobulin G (IgG) in four production stages (suckling, early growing, late growing, finishing), on commercial Finnish pig farms using a total of 117 piglets. The relationship between gender and biomarker dynamics was investigated, as well as the relationships between these biomarkers in saliva and serum.

resultsThe highest salivary concentrations of Hp, ADA and IgG were measured in suckling piglets. The differences between production stages were generally larger in saliva than for the corresponding serum biomarkers. All correlation coefficients between salivary biomarkers were positive in each production stage and the strength of the correlation varied from 0.245 to 0.762. No similar trend was observed regarding correlation coefficients either between serum biomarkers or between salivary and serum biomarkers. Gender was associated with some biomarker concentrations.

conclusionsThe biomarker dynamics supported previous findings that collection of analytical samples should be conducted in age-matched populations. Positive and even strong relationships between salivary biomarkers indicate the potential to use especially saliva for health monitoring. Our results also suggest the importance of considering gender effects when assessing some salivary or serum biomarkers.

Indexed as

BiomarkerCorrelationField studyGenderLongitudinalPig farmPorcineSalivaSerum

Identifiers

PMID38773547
PMCPMC11110307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.