ReviewMalaria journal2024
Considerations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control.
Review in Malaria journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term stability and performance of Cas9/guide RNA-based gene drives in anopheline mosquitoes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Local implementation of scalable malaria molecular surveillance in a low-resource setting: a North-South collaborative model.Malaria journal · 2026Article
- Genetic engineering for SIT application: a fruit fly-focused review.Insect science · 2026Review
- Advances in CRISPR gene drives for mosquito population control.Current opinion in microbiology · 2026Review
- Present and Future of Mosquito-Borne Disease Control in Europe with a Specific Focus on the Mediterranean.Insects · 2026Review
- Integrating mosquito genomics into simulation modeling: opportunities for better-informed biocontrol.Current opinion in insect science · 2026Review
- Advances in population-based interventions to control falciparum malaria.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025Review
- A male-drive female-sterile system for the self-limited control of the malaria mosquito Anopheles gambiae.Nature communications · 2025Article
- "Have Scientists Done Enough?" Community Perspectives on Gene Drive-Modified Mosquitoes for Malaria Control in Northern Uganda: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2025Article
- Requirements for designing cluster randomised control trials to detect suppression of malaria vector population densities.BMC biology · 2025Article
- Synthetic homing endonuclease gene drives to revolutionise Aedes aegypti biocontrol - game changer or pipe dream?Current opinion in insect science · 2025Review
- A suppression-modification gene drive for malaria control targeting the ultra-conserved RNA gene mir-184.Nature communications · 2025Article
- ExploitingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A Comparative Assessment of Self-limiting Genetic Control Strategies for Population Suppression.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- A model-informed target product profile for population modification gene drives for malaria control.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Publisher Correction: Considerations for first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control.Malaria journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sustainable reductions in African malaria transmission require innovative tools for mosquito control. One proposal involves the use of low-threshold gene drive in Anopheles vector species, where a 'causal pathway' would be initiated by (i) the release of a gene drive system in target mosquito vector species, leading to (ii) its transmission to subsequent generations, (iii) its increase in frequency and spread in target mosquito populations, (iv) its simultaneous propagation of a linked genetic trait aimed at reducing vectorial capacity for Plasmodium, and (v) reduced vectorial capacity for parasites in target mosquito populations as the gene drive system reaches fixation in target mosquito populations, causing (vi) decreased malaria incidence and prevalence. Here the scope, objectives, trial design elements, and approaches to monitoring for initial field releases of such gene dive systems are considered, informed by the successful implementation of field trials of biological control agents, as well as other vector control tools, including insecticides, Wolbachia, larvicides, and attractive-toxic sugar bait systems. Specific research questions to be addressed in initial gene drive field trials are identified, and adaptive trial design is explored as a potentially constructive and flexible approach to facilitate testing of the causal pathway. A fundamental question for decision-makers for the first field trials will be whether there should be a selective focus on earlier points of the pathway, such as genetic efficacy via measurement of the increase in frequency and spread of the gene drive system in target populations, or on wider interrogation of the entire pathway including entomological and epidemiological efficacy. How and when epidemiological efficacy will eventually be assessed will be an essential consideration before decisions on any field trial protocols are finalized and implemented, regardless of whether initial field trials focus exclusively on the measurement of genetic efficacy, or on broader aspects of the causal pathway. Statistical and modelling tools are currently under active development and will inform such decisions on initial trial design, locations, and endpoints. Collectively, the considerations here advance the realization of developer ambitions for the first field trials of low-threshold gene drive for malaria vector control within the next 5 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.